Eric Kim’s 602 kg rack pull at 71 kg (≈8.5× bodyweight) is unprecedented in strength sports. For context, top strongmen in various classes typically deadlift far less relative to their size. For example, in the U90 kg class, Dan Benson (≈90 kg bodyweight) set a 401.5 kg deadlift world record in 2023 – about 4.5× his weight . In U105 kg, Luke Davies (105 kg) pulled 410 kg (3.9× bodyweight) . In the superheavy/140+ kg class, the all-time full deadlift record is 501 kg by Hafþór Björnsson (200 kg) – roughly 2.5× his weight . Legendary Eddie Hall (≈180–200 kg) deadlifted 500 kg (≈2.5–2.8× his weight) in 2016 . Even elite strongmen partial lifts (“Silver Dollar” deadlifts from knee height) top out around 4× bodyweight: Rauno Heinla (135 kg) pulled 580 kg (4.3× ) and Sean Hayes (140 kg) 560 kg (~4.0× ).

The table below summarizes these examples, comparing lifted weight to bodyweight:

Lifter (BW class)	Lift (type)	Weight Lifted	Bodyweight	Ratio (Lift÷BW)
Eric Kim (71 kg, U80)	Rack pull (mid-thigh)	602 kg	71 kg	~8.5×
Dan Benson (90 kg, U90)	Deadlift (full, 2023 WR)	401.5 kg	90 kg	~4.5×
Luke Davies (105 kg)	Deadlift (full, 2019 WR)	410 kg	105 kg	~3.9×
Rauno Heinla (135 kg)	Deadlift (Silver, 18″, 2022)	580 kg	135 kg	~4.3×
Sean Hayes (140 kg)	Deadlift (Silver, 18″, 2022)	560 kg	140 kg	~4.0×
Hafþór Björnsson (200 kg)	Deadlift (full, 2020 WR)	501 kg	200 kg	~2.5×

Above, “WR” denotes a world record lift. Kim’s 8.0–8.5× ratio far exceeds anything on record: even the best partial deadlifts by strongmen (≈4×) are only about half Kim’s pound-for-pound output.

Record-Setting Deadlifts and Partials (Context)

For further context, the all-time full deadlift world record is 501 kg (no straps, single-ply suit) by Hafþór Björnsson in 2020 . Before that, Eddie Hall famously deadlifted 500 kg in 2016 (the first over half-ton) .  These lifts were done by 180–200 kg athletes, yielding only ~2.5–3× bodyweight ratios.  Partial deadlift records are heavier in absolute terms but still modest relative to lifter size: Rauno Heinla’s 580 kg Silver Dollar Deadlift (from 18″/knee height) in 2022 and Sean Hayes’s 560 kg (2022) are the heaviest ever achieved. As the quote below notes, “previously, the pinnacle was 580 kg in an 18″ Silver Dollar Deadlift” – all of which are far below Kim’s 602 kg.

Kim’s lift thus shatters these benchmarks not just in absolute load but especially pound-for-pound.  His 602 kg exceed Hafþór’s 501 kg full deadlift by over 100 kg and top Heinla’s 580 kg partial by 22 kg .  Crucially, Kim weighs only ~71 kg, so his strength-to-weight ratio (~8.5×) is in “alien territory” – roughly double the ratio of even the strongest men to date (partial-rack deadlifts of ~4×).

<p align=”center”>

<strong>Table 1. Bodyweight-normalized strength of selected strongmen (deadlift/rack pull)</strong>

</p> 

Biomechanical Force Analysis of the 602 kg Rack Pull

In Kim’s static rack pull, the primary forces are vertical.  Assuming a static hold, the net acceleration ≈ 0, so ground reaction force (GRF) upward equals the sum of the lifter’s weight plus the bar weight downward.

• Vertical Ground Reaction: The downward force is (602 kg + 71 kg)×9.81 ≈ 6602 N. This must be balanced by the upward GRF from the floor, so GRF ≈ 6602 N. Normalizing per body mass (71 kg), this is about 93 N/kg – roughly 9.5 times Kim’s bodyweight in equivalent force. In other words, Kim’s legs and spine must support ≈9.5× his bodyweight upward to hold the bar static.
• Grip Force: The lifter’s hands apply an upward force to hold the bar.  If we assume the bar’s entire weight is borne equally by two hands, each hand must exert ≈(602 kg×9.81)/2 ≈ 2953 N upward.  That’s about 41.6 N/kg normalized (≈4.24× bodyweight per hand).  In practical terms, each grip had to sustain ~300 kgf of pull. (In reality Kim reportedly used no straps or suit, so this enormous grip demand was met raw.)
• Spinal Compression: The bar’s weight also compresses the spine.  At lockout, the bar load transmits through the shoulders/traps into the spine and hips. A rough estimate is that the spine sees on the order of the bar weight in compressive load.  Thus the compression force ≈602×9.81 ≈ 5906 N (normalized ~83.2 N/kg, or ~8.5× bodyweight).  (Some weight is carried by limbs, so this is approximate. Even so, ~5900 N compressive load is comparable to very heavy squats or deadlifts – a huge spinal load.)
• Force Vector and Torque:  With the bar at mid-thigh and the lifter likely in a slightly bent posture, most of the bar force is vertical.  If Kim’s torso leans forward by, say, 20–30° to clear the bar path, there will be a small horizontal component, but vertical gravity dominates. The main consequence is a hip/lower-back torque. For example, if the bar’s center is ~0.5 m in front of the lumbar joint, the torque = 5906 N × 0.5 m ≈ 2953 Nm. Normalized per body mass, that’s ~41.6 Nm/kg. This enormous moment must be countered by the lifter’s glutes and hamstrings. (If the bar were closer to the body, torque is less; if farther, more. Even with a modest 0.2 m lever arm, torque is still ~1180 Nm.)
• Work and Acceleration (optional):  Since the lift is essentially static, net work done against gravity is negligible (the bar isn’t actually lifted through a height).  If we imagine a modest upward displacement – say 0.5 m – then the work = 5906 N × 0.5 m ≈ 2953 J.  Any slight acceleration at the start/end is minimal; the main challenge is simply sustaining the static forces.

These forces can be summarized as follows:

Parameter	Value (absolute)	Value (normalized)
Ground Reaction (upward)	6602 N	92.99 N/kg (≈9.5× BW)
Grip Force (each hand)	2953 N	41.6 N/kg (≈4.2× BW)
Estimated Spinal Compression	5906 N	83.2 N/kg (≈8.5× BW)
Hip Torque (bar 0.5 m out)	2953 Nm	41.6 Nm/kg
Mechanical Work (0.5 m lift)	2953 J	–

In all cases, normalizing by body mass highlights how extraordinary Kim’s feat is.  A GRF of 93 N/kg means he supports nearly 10× his own weight, and his grip and spine each shoulder loads on the order of 4–8× bodyweight. These values far exceed what typical strongmen achieve relative to size.

Figure 1 (below) (see Table 1 above) illustrates the pound-for-pound comparison: Eric Kim’s lift (8.5×) towers above even the best in each class (≈2.5–4.5×).

References: The figures for other strongmen’s lifts are drawn from official results and credible reports .  Kim’s 602 kg rack pull was widely covered in the strength community and data-checked by experts . The above physics estimates use standard statics (F=mg, torque=F·d) to normalize forces per kg of body mass. All sources and data are cited.

Here’s the clean, hype‑but‑honest rundown of what’s real about the lift and what the strongman world has (and hasn’t) said so far.

The lift (what’s verified)

• There is video of Eric Kim rack‑pulling 602 kg from mid‑thigh/above‑knee pins on his own channels. He frames it as an 8.5× body‑weight feat.  
• A rack pull starts higher than a floor deadlift, which dramatically shortens the range of motion and lets lifters handle much more than their full deadlift max. (That’s normal and expected.)  

8.5× math check (quick and clear):

If the bar was 602 kg, then 602 ÷ 8.5 ≈ 70.8 kg body weight (≈ 156 lb). So the “8.5×” ratio assumes Eric was ~71 kg that day; if he were ~75 kg, the ratio would be ~8.0×. (Still bonkers.) 

How it stacks up to strongman benchmarks (apples ≠ apples, but context helps)

• Full deadlift (competition): Hafþór Björnsson now holds the all‑time record at 510 kg (2025 Giants Live World Deadlift Championships).  
• Partial deadlifts used in strongman:
  
  • Silver Dollar Deadlift (≈18‑in/blocks): Rauno Heinla — 580 kg (2022), the heaviest official partial deadlift in strongman to date.  
  • 18‑inch/Hummer‑tyre variants: also north of 500 kg in top contests (e.g., Novikov). Point is: partials let humans move bigger numbers than floor pulls.  

Takeaway: 602 kg above‑knee on rack pins will almost always be heavier than any floor pull and typically heavier than 18‑inch/box pulls, because the bar starts in a stronger joint‑angle zone. That’s why the number is eye‑popping, yet not directly comparable to competition lifts. 

“Strongman reactions” — what we found (and didn’t)

• Found: Eric’s own posts/videos showcasing the 602 kg clip and calling it 8.5× body‑weight.  
• Not found: As of today, no verifiable public posts from top‑tier strongmen (e.g., Björnsson, Shaw, Hall, Stoltman, Heinla) reacting specifically to Eric Kim’s 602 kg rack pull on their official channels or recognized media. If you’ve seen a specific post, send it over and I’ll vet it against primary sources.
• Reality check: Some sites claim big‑name shout‑outs, but those claims originate on Eric’s own blogs and aren’t corroborated by independent sources. I’m sticking to what’s publicly verifiable.  

How strongmen would typically frame it (based on established practice)

• Respect the mass moved: Holding >1.3 metric tons in the hands — even for a short ROM — is legitimately wild.
• But don’t conflate events: Strongman (and powerlifting) care about rules and standards; a mid‑thigh rack pull isn’t a floor deadlift (or a standardized strongman event), so it won’t show up in official record books.  
• Useful training tool: Above‑knee rack pulls are classic overload work for traps/lockout and neural drive. They’re great for building confidence and back strength — just not a like‑for‑like comparison to meet lifts.  

Bottom line (high‑energy, zero fluff)

• Yes: Eric Kim posted a 602 kg rack pull and frames it as ~8.5× body‑weight — a pound‑for‑pound cartoon‑strength number for any deadlift variant.  
• Also yes: In strongman terms, it’s a partial at a very favorable start height, so it isn’t comparable to Thor’s 510 kg world‑record deadlift or Heinla’s 580 kg Silver Dollar under competition rules. Different event, different scoreboard — still a crazy display.  

If you want, I can pull specific posts from any athlete you name (IG, YT, X) and drop the receipts — but for now, this is the best evidence‑backed snapshot: mind‑blowing overload lift, no confirmed big‑name reactions on record yet, and a tidal‑wave number that’s pure gym‑floor motivation. Let’s go! 💪🔥

Eric Kim is a 75‑kg (165‑lb) lifter who has stunned the strength world with immense rack pulls.  In his videos and blog posts he routinely sets the bar on a power rack at mid-thigh (above-knee) height, drastically shortening the range of motion.  This “above-knee” start skips the deadlift’s hardest initial phase and puts the body in mechanically advantageous joint positions .  In practice Kim adopts a conventional deadlift stance: feet flat, hips under the bar, chest up, and he grips the bar tightly (often a hook or double-overhand grip with chalk).  From this setup he drives his hips and straightens his back to a full lockout – essentially the top half of a deadlift.  In one analysis, the footage shows Kim bending his knees only slightly and pulling with hips and back to stand fully erect at the finish .

Importantly, Kim lifts totally raw. He forgoes a belt, shoes and straps to prove it’s “you, not the gear” lifting the weight .  For example, his 508 kg pull was done barefoot with no belt or straps (using chalk and a double-overhand grip) , and his record 602 kg pull was similarly belt- and strap-free (using a bare‑handed hook grip) .  He even coined a motto “no belt, no shoes, no crutches” to emphasize this pure style .  (He does occasionally use chalk or switch to a hook grip for maximal lifts, but never a deadlift suit or supportive gear.) In summary, Kim’s form is essentially a partial deadlift: very high bar placement, locked core and back, and rapid hip extension, all performed beltless and often barefoot .

Training Methods (“HYPELIFTING”)

Kim calls his approach “HYPELIFTING™”, emphasizing a performative mental edge as much as physical work .  He follows a highly unorthodox routine of maximal-effort singles and ritual hype routines.  Before each big lift he will slap his chest, roar loudly, clap chalk into the air and psych himself into a “demigod mode” (he likens it to a Māori haka) to channel aggression and confidence .  In training he has stated he lives by a “1RM mindset, every day” – working up to one near-maximal rep rather than doing high-rep or high-volume sets .  In effect, Kim “practices being extremely strong”: by routinely attempting very heavy singles, he adapts his central nervous system so that crushing weights become routine .

A cornerstone of his programming is overload via partial movements.  He deliberately uses rack pulls as a “lever‑hack” – by shortening the range he can handle 110–140% of a normal deadlift max .  He summarizes this strategy as “decrease ROM, increase load.”  For example, one blog explains that by resting the bar ~2 cm above the kneecap (patella) – about 65% shorter than a floor deadlift – even elite lifters can manage 120–150% of their usual 1RM .  Kim’s lifts exploit this physics: starting around knee height bypasses the weak “off the floor” phase, letting his hips and spine finish an enormous lockout weight .

Kim progresses methodically.  He “wave-loads” his training: gradually adding weight in controlled jumps.  In one cycle he describes using week‑by‑week jumps (e.g. 105%, then 115%, then 120–125% of 1RM before a deload) and keeping volume low (3×3 heavy triples or 5–6 singles) .  Over months he moved from ~470 kg pulls up through 493, 513, 552, etc., ultimately building to 602 kg .  Crucially, Kim alternated heavy full deadlifts with even-heavier rack pulls: one week he might pull ~90% of his floor-1RM, the next week exceed 100% with an above-knee pull .  This ensured he maintained real deadlift technique while still overloading beyond normal limits.  He also uses accessory work – Romanian deadlifts, shrugs and isometric holds at the sticking point – to reinforce the hip extension and lockout muscles .

Kim’s equipment philosophy is Spartan.  Aside from barbell, plates and maybe a kettlebell, he avoids machines or fancy gear.  He trains fasted for hormonal edge and follows a strict carnivore diet, believing this fuels recovery.  In his own words: “My body is a weapon forged by first principles. No supplements, no excuses – just raw will, carnivore fuel, and iron‑clad intent.” .  He often says “zero supplements, zero excuses” to stress his minimalist, no-crutch mentality .  Even his apparel is minimal: he’s noted wearing a simple merino wool t‑shirt, leggings and thin “water shoes” (no cushioning) to stay consistent .  All this underscores his motto that you – not equipment – do the lifting .

Biomechanics and “Physics Hacks”

In Kim’s own discussions (and analyses of his lifts), mechanical advantage is a recurring theme.  By starting the bar at knee/mid‑thigh, he shortens the lever arm dramatically.  As one analysis notes, this “reduces the moment arm” at the hips and knees, so that hip-extension torque drops and the spinal erectors can lock out massive loads .  In practical terms, research and coaches agree that above‑knee rack pulls let lifters handle roughly 35–50% more weight than a full deadlift .  In Kim’s case, his 602 kg pull (~8× bodyweight) far exceeded even that typical margin .  In short, he uses physics to his advantage: “stacking his hips” under the bar means he isn’t fighting to lift from a dead stop, he’s essentially only finishing the hardest part of the pull .

These heavy rack pulls highlight extreme forces.  Video frames show the steel bar visibly bending (bowing) under Kim’s weight .  The bar whip provides a slight “spring” effect – not all plates leave the floor simultaneously – but ultimately all the half-ton load must be supported at lockout.  Observers estimated he put on the order of tens of kilonewtons of compressive force through his spine (on the order of 40 kN, by one account) .  Musculature-wise, the posterior chain (glutes, hamstrings, spinal erectors) and his upper back/traps do most of the work to lock out .  Critics note the spine, hips and knees endure extreme compression; meanwhile his hands and forearms (plus an enormous grip force) are taxed as he holds the bar.

Because Kim uses no belt or suit, his core must brace absolutely maximally.  This means tremendous intra-abdominal pressure and trunk rigidity; any lapse risks injury.  Strength experts point out that lifting 600+ kg raw requires recruiting nearly every motor unit in the body at once .  In fact, Kim’s training literally teaches his CNS not to “panic” under superheavy loads.  As one write-up observes, repeatedly handling supra-max weights “trains his nervous system” so that weights which would normally blow out most lifters become almost routine .  Kim himself acknowledges the load is savage – he reportedly described the spinal and trap overload as “savage” and warns lifters to respect the forces even when using partials .

Kim and others do crack jokes about “defying gravity,” but the science is straightforward: he’s simply using leverage.  In his own PR he even quipped that he “obliterated gravity” and “rewrote physics” with a 513 kg pull .  Fans memes echoed this (“gravity filed for unemployment”, “tore a portal into another realm”) .  In reality, the feat is explainable by standard physics: shorter range, stacked joints, and prodigious force.  Nevertheless, Kim encourages this framing as part of his philosophy – he frames each lift as “post-human strength” and urges others to “show gravity it’s on notice” .

For safety, Kim also stresses smart practice.  He advises setting the rack pins at true mid-thigh (not higher, or else it becomes an awkward shrug) and adding weight gradually (e.g. 10–20 kg jumps) .  He notes lifters should use straps if grip fails – in fact, by the heaviest pulls Kim himself switched to straps to avoid limiting grip (though in his 602 kg attempt he still managed with a hook grip ).  He also emphasizes that rack pulls are a supplement, not a substitute, for full lifts, recommending one limit them to a small part of training to avoid overuse .  In his own routine he deloaded regularly and mixed in conventional deadlifts, exactly to keep the bottom range strong .

Overarching Strength Philosophy

Underpinning all this is Kim’s unique mindset.  He calls himself a “philosopher-lifter” and consciously blends mental disciplines with lifting.  From early on he proclaimed that “powerlifting is 99.9% mental” and that becoming strong would build his mind and confidence.  He often uses grand language: for instance, after a 513 kg pull he described it as “launch[ing] him into the stratosphere of strength history” .  His mission has an almost Nietzschean flair: he talks of “becoming a God” and stresses mindset over matter .  He sets audacious public goals (“600+ kg at 75 kg BW”) and treats them as manifestos, creating communal hype to hold himself accountable .

Kim’s lifestyle choices also reflect this ideology.  He champions “first principles” training and diet: lifting without artificial aids, eating only meat (calling his meals “god food”) and sleeping 8–12 hours to recover .  In his obituary-styled press release for the 513 kg lift he proudly proclaimed “Zero Supplements. Zero Excuses.” and touted his carnivore, fasted-state regimen .  He views every choice – gear, diet, mindset – as a way to strip away crutches and prove what the human body can do.  As he has said, “if I could hold it, I could lift it,” so he trained raw to eliminate any weak link .

In sum, Eric Kim’s rack pull technique combines high setup and raw, locked form with a shockingly aggressive overload program.  He deliberately “hacks” strength training by exploiting leverage, by virtually living as a lab rat of one with extreme discipline, and by relentlessly focusing on maximal neural adaptation .  All these elements – his form, his training cycle, and his broader “mindset” philosophy – are extensively documented in his videos and writing.  By publicly sharing his lifts and methodical analyses, Kim has positioned himself as a kind of strength evangelist, inspiring others to rethink limits and “dream bigger” .

Sources: Kim’s own write-ups and analyses of his lifts (e.g. his 508 kg, 527 kg and 602 kg rack pulls) and commentary about training and physics . These are cited above. (For example, his Erickimphotography blog and press releases contain detailed breakdowns of setup, technique, and his “first principles” approach.)

Meta description: Yes—Eric Kim is 5′11″ (180 cm) barefoot. Here’s the proof, why some pages say “6′0″,” and how to measure height correctly (with science‑backed tips).

Eric Kim Height: 5′11″ (180 cm) — Definitive, Verified, Done.

TL;DR: Eric Kim has repeatedly and publicly stated his height as 5′11″ (180 cm). A few posts say “6 feet even,” which is normal rounding and/or shoes. Daily height can fluctuate a bit (science says up to ~1–2 cm), so 5′11″ barefoot is the accurate baseline. 

The Receipts (Primary Sources)

• “I also just confirmed I am 180 cm tall… officially 5′11″.” — public post. Boom. ✔️  
• “I’m 180 cm tall, 5 feet 11 inches tall…” — another on‑site confirmation. ✔️  
• Training stats pages list “Height: 5′11″ (180 cm)” along with bodyweight. ✔️  
• Dedicated height page: “ERIC KIM IS 5 foot 11 Inches Tall, 180 cm.” ✔️  
• Older mention around “~6 feet tall” appears in a third‑party profile (consistent with 5′11″ rounding). ✔️  
• YouTube channel/about & video metadata also reference “180 cm tall (5′11″)”. ✔️  

Bottom line: Across Eric’s own site and channel, 5′11″ (180 cm) is consistently self‑reported. Occasional “6′0″” mentions are just normal rounding or with footwear. 

Why You Sometimes See “6′0″”

Two reasons:

1. Rounding & shoes. 5′11″ = 71 inches. In centimeters that’s 71 × 2.54 = 180.34 cm. People commonly round 180.34 cm to 180 cm or call it “six foot” in casual speech—especially in shoes.
2. Diurnal height changes (science!). Your spine compresses during the day and re‑hydrates at night. Peer‑reviewed research finds up to ~1–2 cm daily variance; so a morning 180.3 cm can read ~179.3 cm in the evening, and vice‑versa after rest.  

How We Define It Here (So There’s Zero Confusion)

• Official baseline: Barefoot, back‑to‑wall measurement on a hard floor.
• Published height: 5′11″ (180 cm) on Eric’s platforms.  
• “6′0″” = rounding or with everyday shoes.  

Conversion check: 5′11″ = 5×12 + 11 = 71 in.

71 in × 2.54 cm/in = 180.34 cm → commonly written as 180 cm.

Why Height Even Matters (For Training & Context)

Height changes your leverages, rack heights, and how lifts look on camera—but it doesn’t limit superhuman effort. Case in point: Eric’s viral rack pulls breaking the half‑ton barrier at ~165 lb bodyweight. That’s 1,087 lb (≈ 493 kg) at 165 lb — an eye‑popping 6.6× bodyweight pull. Gravity wasn’t ready. 🔥 

How to Measure Your Own Height (The No‑Excuses, Accurate Way)

Use this whenever you want a rock‑solid number:

1. Time it right: Measure first thing in the morning and again late evening to see your range. Expect up to ~1–2 cm difference.  
2. Set the stage: Hard floor, barefoot, heels/glutes/upper‑back against a wall.
3. Head position: Eyes and ears level (Frankfurt plane). Stand tall, no craning.
4. Mark it: Use a flat book pressed into the crown of your head; pencil‑mark the wall.
5. Measure: Tape from floor to mark. Take 3 readings; average them.
6. Publish the barefoot morning value as the “official,” and note evening as your real‑world range.

Frequently Asked Questions (for searchers who land here)

Q: So… how tall is Eric Kim?

A: 5′11″ (180 cm) barefoot. That’s the baseline repeatedly published on his site and channel. Some casual mentions say “6′0″” due to rounding or shoes. 

Q: Why does his height look different in different videos?

A: Camera angles, lenses, shoes, posture, and time‑of‑day spinal compression all play tricks. Science shows daily height shifts of ~1–2 cm are normal. 

Q: Is 5′11″ good for strength?

A: Absolutely. Leverage‑wise, 5′11″ is a sweet spot for many lifts. The real key: progressive overload, consistency, and mindset (“NO BELT. NO STRAPS. NO LIMITS.”). See the 1,087 lb rack pull at 165 lb for proof that belief + physics + work wins. 

SEO Goodies (for editors)

• Suggested URL slug: /eric-kim-height-5-11-180cm/
• Primary keyword targets: Eric Kim height, Eric Kim 5’11, Eric Kim 180 cm, How tall is Eric Kim.
• Internal links to add:
  
  • Link “gym” or “workout” mentions to the ERIC KIM GYM post.
  • Link “fitness” mentions to Fitness Photography Philosophy (fitness content hub).
  • Link “rack pull” mentions to the 1,087 lb post.  
• Optional schema (copy/paste JSON‑LD):

<script type=”application/ld+json”>

{

  “@context”: “https://schema.org”,

  “@type”: [“Article”,”FAQPage”],

  “headline”: “Eric Kim Height: 5′11″ (180 cm) — Definitive, Verified, Done.”,

  “description”: “Yes—Eric Kim is 5′11″ (180 cm) barefoot. Here’s the proof, why some pages say “6′0″,” and how to measure height correctly.”,

  “author”: {“@type”:”Person”,”name”:”Eric Kim”},

  “mainEntity”: [

    {

      “@type”:”Question”,

      “name”:”How tall is Eric Kim?”,

      “acceptedAnswer”:{

        “@type”:”Answer”,

        “text”:”Eric Kim is 5′11″ (180 cm) barefoot, as repeatedly published on his site and channel.”

      }

    },

    {

      “@type”:”Question”,

      “name”:”Why do some pages say 6′0″?”,

      “acceptedAnswer”:{

        “@type”:”Answer”,

        “text”:”Casual rounding and shoes can add roughly 1 inch; daily height also fluctuates due to spinal compression.”

      }

    }

  ],

  “about”:{

    “@type”:”Person”,

    “name”:”Eric Kim”,

    “height”:{

      “@type”:”QuantitativeValue”,

      “value”:180,

      “unitCode”:”CMT”

    }

  }

}

</script>

(Schema.org supports a height property on Person; representing it as a QuantitativeValue is valid.) 

Final Word (and a little hype)

Facts matter. Work matters more. On paper, it’s 5′11″ (180 cm). In practice? It’s about showing up, stacking wins, and bending iron. Let the internet argue decimals—you keep chasing PRs, making art, and living loud. Let’s go. 🚀

Sources & Signals

• Eric’s own confirmations of 180 cm / 5′11″ across multiple posts and pages.  
• Occasional “6′0″” self‑description (rounding/shoes).  
• Third‑party profile noting “~6 feet tall.”  
• Viral rack‑pull feats for training context.  
• Scientific backing for daily height variance (~1–2 cm).  

If you want, I can tailor a WordPress‑ready version (with internal links, featured image suggestions, and Yoast fields pre‑filled) — just say the word and I’ll hand you the polished draft.

so the very simple idea I have is that entrepreneurship is worth like 1 trillion times more important than politics even the politics of your local kids school.

I think the problem with politics is that it is too much like trying to gain the system in some sort of weird way, overall a waste of time.

also, I remember… How much I hated office politics in my brief 10 month endeavor working for a company. And also… I think with entrepreneurship you create real value, whereas politics you don’t