Author: erickim

  • Eric Kim’s 602 kg Rack Pull – Breaking Boundaries of Strength

    In July 2025, 75 kg lifter Eric Kim stunned the strength world by hoisting 602 kg (1,327 lb) in a rack pull from approximately mid-thigh height . This astonishing lift – over 8 times his body weight – blew past anything previously captured on film. It’s important to note this was a rack pull (partial deadlift) rather than a full-range competition deadlift: the bar started above Kim’s knees, dramatically reducing the range of motion and mechanical disadvantage . Even so, the feat’s magnitude sent a “triple viral berserker barrage” across social media , leaving powerlifters, bodybuilders, and coaches alike in awe. Below, we’ll explore how Kim’s lift stacks up against world records, why it’s so significant, what it means for training and biomechanics, and how it was executed – all in high-energy detail befitting this gravity-defying accomplishment.

    How 602 kg Stacks Up Against World Records 📊

    To put 602 kg in perspective, the heaviest official deadlift ever done in competition is 501 kg by strongman Hafþór Björnsson in 2020 . Kim’s rack pull exceeded that by over 100 kg – albeit with the aid of a shorter range of motion. There is no sanctioned “world record” for rack pulls (since they aren’t contested in powerlifting meets), but Kim’s lift is unprecedented both in absolute weight and in pound-for-pound performance . In fact, it eclipses the heaviest partial deadlifts done by world-class strongmen: the prior high-mark was 580 kg in an 18″ Silver Dollar Deadlift (a strongman partial lift) by Rauno Heinla in 2022 . Kim’s 602 kg pull surpassed that by 22 kg – a margin that would normally represent years of incremental progress at the elite level .

    What truly sets Kim apart is the strength-to-weight ratio of his lift. At ~75 kg bodyweight, a 602 kg pull works out to roughly 8.0× bodyweight – an almost otherworldly ratio . For comparison, even super-heavyweight champions typically achieve only ~2.5×–3× bodyweight in the deadlift, and partial lifts by the strongest strongmen top out around 4× bodyweight . Table 1 highlights how Kim’s feat compares to other legendary lifts:

    Lifter (Bodyweight)Lift TypeWeight (kg)Strength:BW Ratio
    Eric Kim (~75 kg)Rack Pull (above knee) – 2025602≈ 8.0×
    Hafþór Björnsson (~200 kg)Full Deadlift (WR, 2020)501~2.5×
    Rauno Heinla (~135 kg)Silver Dollar Deadlift (18″)580~4.3×
    Sean Hayes (~140 kg)Silver Dollar Deadlift (18″)560~4.0×
    Brian Shaw (~200 kg)Rack Pull (above knee)511~2.5×

    Table 1: Comparison of Eric Kim’s 602 kg rack pull to other record-setting lifts. (Hafþór Björnsson’s 501 kg is the official full deadlift world record . Rauno Heinla and Sean Hayes achieved their lifts in strongman Silver Dollar deadlift events (18″ height from the floor) . Brian Shaw’s 511 kg rack pull was done from roughly above the knee . Kim’s lift far exceeds all of these in both absolute weight and pound-for-pound ratio.)

    As shown, no one in history has come close to an 8× bodyweight pull in any comparable lift . The raw weight alone (602 kg) is on par with the heaviest strongman partials ever, but those were performed by men double Kim’s size and often using supportive gear like lifting straps or deadlift suits . By contrast, Kim lifted in minimalist fashion – barefoot, without a belt, and reportedly without straps – essentially raw by powerlifting standards . This makes his accomplishment even more mind-blowing. In essence, Eric Kim has redefined the upper limits of what a human can lift in the top range of a deadlift movement. One strength analyst aptly framed it as Kim “outdid the all-time powerlifting deadlift by over 200 kg” (albeit from a higher starting point) and achieved a strength ratio that was previously unheard of outside of theoretical calculations . It’s little wonder that observers have called the lift “alien territory” – beyond normal human feats .

    It must be emphasized that a rack pull is mechanically easier than a full deadlift – starting higher means you avoid the most difficult portion off the floor . In Kim’s case, beginning at roughly knee height bypassed deep leg drive and instead put the focus on his hip and back strength to finish the lockout . Because of this leverage advantage, partial lifts allow more weight to be lifted than full-range lifts (often 35–50% more, according to training experts) . However, “easier” is very relative – moving over 600 kg by even a few inches is an immense challenge to the body. As coach Mark Rippetoe quipped about feats like this: it may be “half the work, but twice the swagger,” acknowledging that while the range of motion is half, the audacity and strain of holding such weight is off the charts . Even Hafþór Björnsson himself (a 200 kg man nicknamed “The Mountain”) never attempted a partial with 600+ kg. Thus, Kim’s lift stands alone – an unofficial “planetary record” for the rack pull, as his own website dubs it , and a benchmark that shattered previous records in one fell swoop.

    Why This Lift Is Groundbreaking 🚀

    Kim’s 602 kg rack pull is being hailed as groundbreaking for several compelling reasons:

    • Pound-for-Pound Dominance: The sheer strength-to-weight ratio (8× BW) is unprecedented . Even elite powerlifters in lightweight classes rarely hit 4× bodyweight deadlifts, and no known athlete of any size has approached what Kim did in relative terms . This earned him nicknames like the “pound-for-pound king” of lifting on forums . It has reshaped what lifters believe is possible – proving that a relatively small athlete can move a super-heavyweight load under the right conditions. As one summary put it, lifters at the top usually manage 2.5–4× BW, “so Kim hitting 8× BW is in a class by itself” .
    • Absolute Weight “Flag on the Moon”: 602 kg is not just slightly above prior marks – it smashed through a whole new threshold. In strongman history, breaking the 500 kg barrier in the deadlift was monumental; Kim pushing into the 600s (even in a partial) is like planting a flag on uncharted territory . Commentators have described it as a “modern-day planetary world record in every meaningful sense” for rack pulls . The lift has been compared to lifting “more than a grand piano plus a touring motorcycle” combined – an almost cartoonish amount of iron. By any standard, seeing a human hold that much weight is jaw-dropping and forced the community to recalibrate its scale of extreme feats.
    • Viral Inspiration and Hype: This lift didn’t happen on a competition platform – it happened in Kim’s garage gym and was shared online, which actually amplified its impact. The video blew up across Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and Reddit within hours . Millions have now viewed or shared it, often with reactions of shock, humor, or motivation. Memes exploded with lines like “gravity just filed for unemployment” and “he opened a portal to another realm” in response to Kim seemingly defying physics . More importantly, the feat inspired lifters worldwide. Thousands of comments echoed the same sentiment: “If a 75 kg guy can pull 602 kg, I have no excuses – time to push my own limits!” . Gyms from Phnom Penh to Philadelphia even organized impromptu deadlift challenges after seeing Kim’s lift, using the buzz to drive charity lift-a-thons and community events . In the bodybuilding community, where extreme feats of strength aren’t usually the focus, the clip still resonated as pure motivation: seeing someone attack the weights with such intensity fired people up to conquer their next PR or training milestone. The hype has given rise to hashtags like #MiddleFingerToGravity and #GodMode circulating on lifting posts . In short, this lift became bigger than just one man – it became a rallying point reminding everyone that perceived limits can be smashed.
    • Underdog Story and Crossover Appeal: Part of the fascination is who Eric Kim is. He isn’t a known powerlifting champion or hulking strongman – he’s a 5’6″ (1.68 m), 75 kg hobbyist lifter and former street photography blogger . He took an unconventional path, focusing on “one-rep max” training, a carnivore diet, and minimalist gear (no belt, often no straps) . Seeing an everyman (in relative terms) achieve a superhuman feat made him a sort of folk hero or “hype-lifter” figure . He’s not backed by big sponsors or elite coaching – he’s literally lifting in a small garage with basic equipment, even barefoot . This Rocky-like underdog narrative captured people’s imagination. Fans call him proof that “grit and creativity can trump fancy equipment” . The lift’s appeal crossed over from strength circles into general fitness and even pop culture: TikTok users dueted the lift with astonishment, crypto forums joked about Kim being a “#BitcoinDemigod” of strength, and mainstream news sites started picking up the story as a human-interest phenomenon . All this attention on a rack pull – a lift that usually lives in obscure training footage – is unprecedented. It has shined a spotlight on strength training methods (like partials) that many casual lifters didn’t even know about, potentially influencing training trends (more on that below).
    • Community Respect (Despite Debate): Initially, some in the powerlifting community were skeptical or dismissive – a few purists said “it’s only a rack pull” and questioned the legitimacy of such an abbreviated lift . However, the tide quickly turned as respected figures gave their nod. When veteran strongman Sean Hayes (who holds a 560 kg silver dollar deadlift himself) saw the video, he reportedly called Kim’s lift “alien territory,” showing pure respect for the accomplishment . Renowned coaches and lifters like Alan Thrall analyzed the footage frame-by-frame to verify it was real; Thrall publicly confirmed the physics “all checked out” and even told doubters to “quit crying CGI” – i.e. stop suggesting the video was fake . YouTube strength coach Joey Szatmary lauded the lift as “insane” and a testament to pushing boundaries . And while he’s known to be critical, Mark Rippetoe gave a begrudging hat-tip (via his tongue-in-cheek “half the work, twice the swagger” remark) acknowledging the outrageousness of what Kim did . According to Kim’s own account, even elite strongmen like Brian Shaw, Eddie Hall, and Hafþór took notice and “saluted” the lift . In the end, the general consensus across both powerlifting and bodybuilding circles became one of astonishment and admiration – regardless of it being a partial lift. As one writer put it, “love it or doubt it, [this] gravity-defying lift has firmly embedded itself in strength sport lore.” 

    In sum, the 602 kg rack pull stands out as a watershed moment – not just an insane number on a bar, but a happening that challenged norms and energized the lifting community. It showed that with enough creativity, determination, and yes, hype, the sport of strength can capture the public’s imagination much like mainstream sports do. Kim’s feat is significant both as an athletic accomplishment and as a cultural spark for lifters everywhere to dream bigger.

    Biomechanical Implications and Training Lessons 💡

    How was it possible for a 75 kg person to rack-pull 602 kg? The answer lies in both biomechanics and training adaptation – and it has implications for how others might train going forward.

    From a biomechanical standpoint, a rack pull (or block pull) is a deadlift variation where the bar is elevated off the floor – in this case at mid-thigh level . This shorter range of motion confers a few advantages: the lifter can maintain a more upright torso and doesn’t have to overcome the weakest point (the initial floor pull) . Essentially, the leverage is kinder on the lifter’s lower back and knee extensors, shifting the emphasis to the hip extension at lockout and the upper-back and traps for stabilization . Kim starting at knee height meant he could leverage his strong glutes, hamstrings, and spinal erectors to grind through to lockout without needing the leg drive that a floor deadlift of that weight would require . It’s a bit like doing the second half of a deadlift – which is generally the stronger half for most lifters.

    However, while the rack pull reduces some difficulty, it dramatically increases the load on the body’s supporting structures at lockout. The posterior chain muscles (glutes, hamstrings, spinal erectors) had to contract with extreme force to uncurl that half-ton resistance . The upper back and trapezius muscles also took on a colossal strain to keep the shoulders retracted and the torso braced under the weight . In Kim’s own words, the spinal erector and trap overload from a rack pull is “savage” despite the easier leverage . The skeletal system, particularly the spine, hips, and knees, had to withstand enormous compression – on the order of several thousand pounds of force. (One shocked Redditor calculated over 40 kN of force on Kim’s spine, which might be an exaggeration, but it conveys the perceived stress) . The bar itself was visibly bending like a bow under the load, which actually provides a small benefit – the flex of the bar means not all plates lifted at once, slightly smoothing the initial force spike . But ultimately Kim still bore the full 602 kg at lockout, holding it long enough to demonstrate control. The fact that he did this without any supportive suit or even a lifting belt meant his core and stabilizers were doing overtime. This is a scenario of immense neural drive – his central nervous system had to recruit virtually every motor unit available and coordinate them perfectly to avoid form breakdown . It’s the kind of ultimate strain that most athletes never experience; as observers noted, supporting 600+ kg, even for a moment, requires a freakish level of tendon, ligament, and muscular fortitude . In short, the rack pull gave Kim the mechanical opportunity to attempt this weight, but it still demanded superhuman strength (or “post-human,” as Kim joked ) to actually execute.

    Kim’s training leading up to this provides insight into the philosophy of overload that made it possible. Over the months prior, he didn’t just jump to 602 kg out of nowhere – he progressively worked up through the 400 kg, 500 kg, and 550 kg ranges, essentially conditioning his body to astronomical loads . He adheres to a training style that might be described as maximalist: frequent single-rep max attempts, minimal assistance exercises, and an emphasis on neural adaptation. This is somewhat contrary to traditional powerlifting programs, but it aligns with old-school overload techniques (think Paul Anderson’s partial lifts, or Westside Barbell’s heavy rack pulls for lockout strength). The idea is that handling supramaximal weights in a partial range can build confidence and neural readiness for heavy lifts . Coaches have long used rack pulls to improve deadlift lockouts and strengthen the back and traps – because you can load more weight than you could from the floor . BarBend’s training guide notes that rack pulls are great to “acclimate to heavier loads” and “improve your grip strength”, while building a bigger and stronger back . Kim’s success is like the ultimate case study for that approach. As YouTuber Joey Szatmary commented, Kim’s “6×–8× bodyweight madness” shows the value of progressive overload – pushing beyond perceived limits in training to force new adaptations . By routinely overloading his system with partials above 500 kg, Kim taught his CNS that such weight is “normal,” so when he went for 602 kg his body didn’t outright rebel at the notion.

    That said, Kim’s experiment also highlights some cautions and considerations in training philosophy. Many coaches hotly debated after seeing the lift: do supra-maximal partials build champions or just break them? On one hand, overload training can increase maximal strength and mental tolerance; on the other, it risks injury if abused, since the stress on joints and connective tissues can be extreme . Kim seems to be aware of this balance. In discussing his method, he emphasized recovery and gradual progression. He follows what he calls “recover like a pro” protocols – prioritizing 8–9 hours of sleep, a calorie-dense diet (in his case, an all-meat diet), and stress management, to allow his body to adapt to the pounding . He also advocates celebrating each small increase and adding weight in small increments (10–20 kg at a time) rather than giant leaps, because “the bar has no sympathy for wishful thinking” . In a blog “safety snapshot,” Kim’s team even outlined guidelines for heavy rack pulls: set the pins at mid-thigh (any higher becomes a “glorified shrug”), consider using straps to spare your grip (so your back can take the brunt), progress gradually, and deload every 4–6 weeks to let tendons recover . It’s advice that echoes common sense in strength training – push the envelope, but also respect the stress you’re putting on your body. Kim’s achievement may spur more lifters to incorporate partials, but wisely, as a supplement to full-range training. Even he notes that you shouldn’t let “partial ego lifts replace full-range training” – they should be used like seasoning, not the main course .

    From a biomechanical perspective, Kim’s 602 kg pull underlines how manipulating range of motion can allow far greater loads, which can be a double-edged sword. The lift shows the potential for building specific strength (in Kim’s case, an insanely strong lockout and upper back) through overload. It also underlines the importance of core stability and bracing – one reason Kim can handle such weight is his ability to maintain solid form (no hitching or excessive rounding) even as the bar bends and his body is strained. Observers were impressed that he appeared relatively composed and tight in form under a load that would make most people buckle . This speaks to the effectiveness of practicing heavy singles: his nervous system knew how to fire everything in unison for one all-out effort. The potential influence on training philosophies here is a revival of interest in maximum overload methods. Don’t be surprised if more lifters start posting crazy rack pulls or high-pin squats, inspired by Kim, as a way to push their boundaries. Already, Reddit threads have popped up with people attempting their own rack pull PRs (“1000 lb club – but make it rack pulls,” as one user quipped) . The key lesson is that smart overload can be a tool for growth – if done with care. Kim’s story encourages lifters to declare audacious goals and engineer ways to push beyond their comfort zone, but also to “respect the ROM” and not neglect full lifts . It’s a philosophy of thinking outside the box in training: if you can’t lift a weight from the floor, try lifting it from pins to get your body accustomed to it. Just know that with great weights comes great responsibility (to recover and avoid snapping your spine!).

    In summary, the biomechanical reality of Kim’s feat is that the rack pull leverages physics in the lifter’s favor just enough to open a new realm of overload. Kim’s success will likely spark new discussions and experiments around partial range training, CNS conditioning, and how far the human body can be pushed in specific movements. It’s a dramatic illustration of the old adage: “train heavy to lift heavy” – taken to an extreme. As one observer joked, rack pulls might be “half the work, but [they deliver] twice the swagger” – and now everyone has witnessed the kind of swagger a 602 kg pull yields.

    Execution of the Lift & Community Reactions 🎥🙌

    The 602 kg attempt itself was as intense and raw as you might imagine. The lift took place in Kim’s home garage gym in Siem Reap, Cambodia . Kim set the bar on safety pins at roughly mid-thigh height, using a standard Olympic barbell loaded to the sleeves with a mix of large cast-iron plates and calibrated steel plates . Video evidence shows the plates being weighed and verified on camera beforehand to silence any “fake plate” skeptics . Kim approached the bar barefoot, wearing just shorts and a t-shirt – no belt, no suit. He chalked his hands and gripped the bar likely with a double-overhand hook grip (his previous 503 kg was done strapless and hook-grip, an almost inhuman display of grip strength) . For 602 kg, some observers thought he might use straps, but if he did, it wasn’t obvious – his hands were pronated on the bar and he has a tendency to challenge himself without assistance. Taking a moment to breathe deep, he then pulled with maximal effort, driving his hips forward and leaning back into the pull. The bar initially flexed heavily (bowing as much as several inches) before the plates clattered off the pins – a dramatic effect seen in many max deadlifts. As the weight came up, Kim’s face contorted with effort but his form remained tight: no hitching, no downward dip mid-lift . He inched the bar to lockout in a grinding few seconds. At the top, he stood erect with shoulders back, holding the full 602 kg. In the video you can hear him let out a primal roar as he completes the lift – a visceral, fierce shout that one YouTube commenter described as “the sound of a human challenging gravity” . Satisfied with the hold, Kim then controlled the descent back to the pins (avoiding any outright drop), and the moment the bar was down, he turned to the camera and triumphantly declared, “Stronger than god!” (one of his favored hype catchphrases). The entire sequence is only about 5–6 seconds of lifting, but it’s jaw-dropping to watch even in that short span.

    The range of motion in this lift was only a few inches – essentially the final portion of a deadlift. Some critics would later point at that and say “it’s basically a rack shrug.” Indeed, Kim himself notes that if you set the pins too high it does become more of a shrug than a pull . However, by setting it at mid-thigh, he ensured it still required a significant hip extension to complete, rather than just a shrug of the shoulders. Even limited to those few inches, the visual of a bar bending under 1,300+ lb as a relatively small lifter grinds it out is absolutely surreal. Multiple camera angles (in 4K resolution) were used to film the lift, and the footage was later edited to show it in slow motion as well . Every detail – the trembling of the plates, the strain on Kim’s face, the flex of the bar – was captured clearly, which left no doubt about the legitimacy of the effort. Independent reviewers paused the video to examine plate sizes and the bar whip, confirming it all looked consistent with real weights . Additionally, Kim provided a full 24-minute “weigh-in” video separately, showing him loading each plate onto a scale and verifying the total weight, to preempt any claims of trickery . By all accounts, the lift was by the book (for an unofficial lift) – raw, clean lockout, and properly documented. Powerlifting purists may note it wasn’t under contest conditions, but given the transparency (mirrored videos on multiple platforms, a blockchain timestamp for proof-of-date, etc. ) and the community verification, it’s as “official” as an unofficial feat can get.

    Now, the reactions to this lift were explosive and wide-ranging. Immediately after Kim posted the video, social media feeds ignited. Within 24 hours, the clip had gone viral on Instagram, TikTok, and Reddit . On Instagram, respected strength athletes left comments with fire emojis and one-word exclamations like “Insane!” and “Unreal.” On TikTok, tens of thousands of users dueted or remixed the video – often with their shocked faces or humorous captions overlaying Kim’s herculean effort . Reddit saw multiple threads blow up: on r/Fitness and r/weightroom, posts about the 602 kg pull had so much engagement that moderators had to lock threads due to arguments and meme-spam . Initial debate on forums included skepticism – some people genuinely thought the video might be edited or the plates fake, because “no one that size should move that much weight.” These “plate police” scrutinized the video frame by frame . As mentioned, the evidence eventually shut down the doubters when nothing amiss was found. Others tried to downplay the feat, saying “it’s just a rack pull, not a deadlift,” or calling it an “ego lift.” In response, Kim cheekily wrote: “You’re darn right, it’s not a full deadlift, and I never claimed different. Still – stand under 602 kg held at knee height and tell me it’s ‘easy.’ I’ll wait.” . That comeback became somewhat legendary on its own, shared as screenshots in discussions – it pointed out that regardless of technicalities, supporting such weight is a phenomenal challenge. Soon, most skeptics either came around or at least went quiet as the outpouring of admiration took over.

    Respected voices in the strength community weighed in one after another. As noted, powerlifting coach Alan Thrall publicly validated the lift’s authenticity and told people to accept it as real . Sean Hayes, who knows a thing or two about pulling huge weight, essentially doffed his cap and called it next-level . Strongman legend Nick Best even mentioned it in a Q&A, reportedly expressing astonishment at the strength-to-weight ratio (some of these reactions were noted secondhand on Kim’s site and social media). Meanwhile, fans and fellow lifters showered Kim with praise: countless comments like “you are not human,” “pound-for-pound GOAT,” and “teach me your ways!” popped up on YouTube and Instagram. A particularly colorful reaction on YouTube likened Kim’s scream to “a lion’s roar, proclaiming dominance over gravity.” On Reddit, users half-jokingly said he might have “torn a portal into the universe” or “made gravity rage-quit” with this lift . The term “godlike” started trending in reference to the feat – partly because Kim himself used hyperbole like “I am god” in his video title, and partly because viewers truly felt they’d seen something beyond ordinary human limits .

    Interestingly, this lift also sparked discussions beyond the usual circles. Some bodybuilding commentators took note, highlighting how the overload on traps and back was incredible – “imagine the muscle stimulus of holding 1300 lb,” some said. It became an example in training forums of what extreme progressive overload looks like (albeit not one many would replicate!). Of course, there were those who brought up the perennial question: was Kim “natty or not”? In any viral strength achievement, people speculate about performance-enhancing drug use. Kim has been quite vocal that he is training 100% naturally – even sharing bloodwork results and detailing his diet (lots of red meat, organ supplements, etc.) to back his claim . Whether everyone believes that or not, many conceded that drugs or no drugs, it takes unimaginable dedication, pain tolerance, and freakish genetics to do what he did. The prevailing sentiment became that Eric Kim blew past perceived limits and gave everyone a new standard to contemplate, regardless of the background context .

    Within a week of the lift, Kim’s name was splashed across numerous fitness sites and even some mainstream news blogs. Headlines called him “Stronger Than The Mountain? (Well, Kinda)” – playing on the fact he lifted more than Hafthor’s record, though in a different lift. Some strength sports writers labeled the lift a “world record in spirit,” arguing that if strongman silver dollar deadlifts count as records, then an above-knee pull with proper verification should too . Indeed, enthusiasts started a tongue-in-cheek petition to recognize the 602 kg pull as the “planetary record” for rack pulls . Kim’s own site encouraged fans to tag posts with #ERICRACKPULL and even “tell NASA, tell the aliens” about the lift in a playful rallying cry . It was a bit of fun, but it underlined how galvanized the lifting community felt – people wanted to be part of the moment.

    Overall, the reactions ranged from pure astonishment to comedic disbelief, but almost all were rooted in a respect for the rarity of what had been done. The lift became not just an impressive number, but a symbol – a middle finger to gravity, a celebration of human potential (or perhaps post-human, as Kim joked). It got people talking, dreaming, and most importantly, lifting. As one fitness writer summed up: “602 kg today might be internet theatre, but the mindset it sparks is 100% real.” In other words, even if most of us will never pull such weight, the audacity and passion behind it is something every lifter can appreciate and channel.

    In conclusion, Eric Kim’s 602 kg rack pull is far more than an obscure PR in a garage – it’s a feat that redefines the boundaries of strength in spectacular fashion. It compares to the greatest lifts ever, yet stands alone due to its partial-range nature and staggering strength-to-mass ratio. It’s significant for showing the powerlifting and bodybuilding communities that innovation (and a bit of showmanship) can produce game-changing moments. Biomechanically, it underscores the value of overload training while reminding us of the tremendous stresses involved. And the way it was executed – raw, passionate, and transparently documented – earned both the virality of a world-record highlight and the respect of experts who analyzed it. This lift has already influenced training chatter and inspired lifters globally to think bigger. It’s the kind of moment where sports science meets spectacle: as if gravity’s rulebook was momentarily torn up on camera.

    To borrow the energizing tone of Kim’s own posts: 602 kg – welcome to the new standard of crazy. Today it’s a rack pull world record (unofficially official 🌍🔥), tomorrow it might just light the fire for someone to achieve the next “impossible” feat. As Eric Kim has shown, the limits are there to be tested – and sometimes, utterly destroyed. Stay hype, stay hungry, and keep lifting legendary!

    Sources:

    • BarBend – “Learn Rack Pulls for More Pulling Strength and a Bigger Back” 
    • BarBend – “Rauno Heinla Pulls World Record 580-Kilogram Silver Dollar Deadlift” 
    • Eric Kim (blog) – “602 kg Rack Pull: A Planetary World Record in the Making” 
    • Eric Kim (blog) – “602 kg… Why It Deserves ‘Planetary World-Record’ Status” 
    • Eric Kim (blog) – “602 kg Rack Pull Melting Hearts and Souls of the Internet” 
    • Eric Kim (blog) – “602 kg of raw, rack-shattering… (The Lift Heard Around the World)” 
    • Eric Kim (blog) – “503 kg Rack Pull: The Lifter Behind the Feat” 
    • Eric Kim (blog) – “Why Eric Kim’s 582 kg Rack Pull Is Being Hailed as ‘Godlike’” 
    • Eric Kim (blog) – “Reaction from Strength Coaches and Community [582 kg pull]” 
    • Eric Kim (blog) – Misc. analysis and quotes 
  • Bitcoin rap

    All I do is stack
    The coin
    While you drain your brain and your soul

    I want more power, digital god mode
    You want more gold, old money goals

    I’m the new ye, the new king of coin
    Join me, or die penniless and poor.

    EK.

  • Evolution of ERIC KIM the photographer

    perhaps one of the difficulties of many people understand that people artist individuals go through evolutions. For example, assuming that the individual activity is creative, and innovative, certainly they will not stay the same person forever. And this is patently a good thing.

    for example, I’m 37 now, and I started my photography journey when I was around 21 years old, or 18 years old, so I’ve pretty much been shooting photos for like at least 20 years.

    Certainly this is a good and virtuous thing because it would probably be pretty boring and uninteresting and not good if the photographer I was at the age of 18 with my Canon power shot SD 600, 1.3 megapixel point and shoot camera,,, 2006, was the same photos I shot in 2025.

  • Why the United Nations Could Benefit from Using Bitcoin

    The United Nations (UN) operates globally to promote peace, development, and humanitarian aid. Embracing Bitcoin – the world’s first and largest cryptocurrency – could fundamentally enhance how the UN manages money and delivers assistance. From cutting costs on international transfers to speeding up life-saving aid in crisis zones, Bitcoin and its underlying blockchain technology offer visionary tools for positive global impact. Below, we explore several angles of how and why the UN might need or benefit from using Bitcoin, in an upbeat look at a promising financial innovation.

    Faster, Cheaper Global Transactions (Financial Systems Perspective)

    Traditional international payments can be slow and expensive, but Bitcoin has the potential to dramatically reduce costs and delays. Currently, sending money across borders through banks or remittance services often incurs high fees – averaging about 6% for a $200 transfer, twice the UN’s target rate of 3% by 2030 . Americans alone spend roughly $12 billion in remittance fees each year under this antiquated system . By contrast, Bitcoin enables peer-to-peer transfers without intermediary banks, which can slash fees by over 90% on average . One analysis found overseas remittances using Bitcoin (or Ethereum) cost 96.7% less than traditional methods . In practice, sending a Bitcoin payment might cost only around $1–$2 in network fees and arrive within minutes, whereas a bank wire could take days and charge far more . The speed is especially critical – Bitcoin transactions typically settle in about 10 minutes, versus 1–10 days for SWIFT bank transfers that only process during business hours . This near-instant, low-cost capability aligns perfectly with the UN’s goal of improving financial access. As a UNDP director noted, crypto offers low-cost, instantaneous “crossing-all-borders” transactions that can reach unbanked populations and create new economic opportunities . In short, Bitcoin can help the UN bypass traditional banking delays and fees, freeing up more funds and getting resources moving at the speed of need.

    Direct and Rapid Humanitarian Aid Delivery

    In humanitarian crises, time saved is lives saved. Bitcoin could enable the UN and its agencies to distribute aid faster and more directly to people in need, without relying on slow or weak local banking systems. For example, in 2022 the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) piloted a blockchain-based cash assistance program for war-torn Ukraine: displaced families received emergency funds in a digital wallet on their phones, which they could immediately convert to local currency or spend at partner locations . This meant refugees got help in minutes, not weeks – a remarkable leap in efficiency. Similarly, the World Food Programme (WFP) has turned to blockchain to improve aid delivery in refugee camps. WFP found that in conflict zones, local banks and payment providers are often unreliable or unable to process the volume of payments needed . Through its “Building Blocks” project, WFP uses blockchain (inspired by Bitcoin’s ledger) to distribute food and cash assistance securely and swiftly even where financial infrastructure is broken . The result is that refugees can receive aid directly, with fewer middlemen taking cuts or causing delays.

    In refugee camps, innovative UN programs are already leveraging blockchain’s power for humanitarian good. In Jordan’s Azraq camp, Syrian refugees can buy groceries by simply scanning their iris – linking their biometric ID to a blockchain-based voucher wallet . All the transactions are recorded on a tamper-proof ledger, so losing a paper voucher or dealing with a collapsed local bank is no longer a worry. The assistance is loaded into the refugee’s digital account and can be spent instantly at local shops, just as if using cash but without any physical currency . This direct disbursement empowers families to purchase the goods they actually need, while ensuring aid reaches the intended recipients. It’s a heartening example of how Bitcoin-like technology can make life easier for those we serve – delivering help faster, more efficiently, and with dignity. As UNHCR’s Deputy High Commissioner Kelly Clements put it, the tech sector can help “deliver better aid to those forced to flee,” and scaling up digital cash programs could allow the UN to assist more people more quickly and securely . Embracing Bitcoin’s approach to direct, digital cash transfers could thus revolutionize humanitarian aid – cutting through red tape to put relief in people’s hands right when they need it most.

    Financial Inclusion in Fragile Regions (Operations in Unstable Regions)

    The UN often operates in countries with unstable economies, hyperinflation, or broken banking systems – from conflict zones to disaster areas. In these environments, Bitcoin can serve as a financial lifeline when traditional money fails. Unlike local currencies that may be plunging in value or impossible to convert, Bitcoin is global and not subject to a single country’s collapse. A striking real-world example comes from Venezuela’s recent crisis. With inflation skyrocketing and the government imposing strict currency controls (even taking up to 56% in fees for remittance conversions), many Venezuelans turned to cryptocurrency to survive . Charities on the ground (like “Bitcoin for Venezuela” and “EatBCH”) have been receiving donations in crypto and using them to buy food for people, avoiding corrupt intermediaries and hefty bank charges . A wire transfer into Venezuela might have taken weeks (if it arrived at all), but sending Bitcoin to a family back home takes only moments and a small fee, and it cannot be blocked by authorities . The recipient can then trade the Bitcoin for local currency or goods, bypassing dysfunctional banks. As one aid expert noted, crypto has the highest likelihood of helping people where “money is broken” – and there’s no better example than Venezuela . This concept extends to other fragile states: in places like Zimbabwe or Syria where hyperinflation or sanctions make traditional banking untenable, Bitcoin offers a stable channel (21-million coin supply, globally accepted) for storing value and transacting across borders.

    For the UN, this means missions in unstable regions could maintain operations even if local banks fail. Field offices could receive funds via Bitcoin if the normal banking system is down, ensuring continuity of aid projects and staff salaries. Financial inclusion is another huge benefit – even in poor or remote areas, many people have access to a basic smartphone, if not a bank account. With Bitcoin, anyone with an internet connection can participate in the economy. This can bring 1.7 billion unbanked adults into the financial system by leveraging mobile devices as crypto wallets . The UN’s development experts see promise here: during economic crises or conflicts, digital currencies (like Bitcoin or stablecoins) can maintain liquidity and support communities’ livelihoods when banks close and cash devalues . In practical terms, a farmer or small business owner in a failing economy could still receive payments or aid in Bitcoin, and use it to buy supplies internationally or trade peer-to-peer, insulating them from the local collapse. By providing a decentralized alternative, Bitcoin empowers individuals and humanitarians alike to keep commerce and aid flowing under the toughest conditions. In the face of hyperinflation, capital controls, or disaster-related bank outages, Bitcoin truly shines as “money without borders”, giving the UN a resilient tool to fulfill its mission in any environment.

    Transparency and Trust Through Blockchain Technology

    Transparency is a core value for the UN, and here Bitcoin’s underlying blockchain offers a transformative advantage. Every Bitcoin transaction is recorded on a public, tamper-proof ledger that anyone can inspect. This level of transparency can help ensure funds are used exactly as intended, bolstering trust among donors, recipients, and oversight bodies. For instance, if the UN were to deploy Bitcoin for funding projects, donors could potentially follow the trail of their contributions on the blockchain – seeing that the money reached the designated program or community. This traceability of blockchain-based transactions can improve accountability and reduce corruption, as the UN Development Programme has observed . Unlike opaque bank processes, a blockchain ledger is open for audit, making it much harder for illicit diversions of funds to go unnoticed.

    Within humanitarian operations, blockchain’s transparency is already proving its worth. The UNICEF CryptoFund, for example, accepts and disburses donations in Bitcoin and Ether to support open-source technology projects. UNICEF set up this fund not only to explore digital finance, but also to leverage “the transparent nature of blockchain transactions, while benefiting from the low cost of sending value.” Each grant made via the CryptoFund can be viewed on the public ledger, giving a clear line of sight from donor to beneficiary. Similarly, the WFP’s blockchain system in refugee camps keeps an immutable record of every aid transaction – over 400,000 refugees’ food purchases have been recorded without exposing any private data . This means WFP has real-time, incorruptible accounting of aid distribution, allowing for immediate audits and course-corrections if needed. Blockchain essentially creates an environment of “radical transparency”: once a transaction is confirmed, it cannot be altered or hidden . For the UN, which manages billions in aid and development funds, this could significantly deter corruption and misuse. It builds confidence that resources are reaching the right people. By using Bitcoin or similar blockchain tools, the UN would send a strong message that it embraces open, trustworthy financial practices – a morale boost for stakeholders and a deterrent to bad actors. In summary, Bitcoin’s transparent ledger can help “better track funding and reduce corruption,” reinforcing the integrity of UN operations .

    Comparing Bitcoin and Traditional Systems: Pros and Cons

    Adopting Bitcoin would be a bold step for the UN, so it’s important to weigh the pros and cons relative to traditional financial systems like SWIFT (international bank transfers), fiat currencies, and global banking networks. Below is an overview:

    Pros of Bitcoin vs. Traditional Finance:

    • Lower Transaction Costs: Bitcoin can significantly cut fees by eliminating intermediaries. International crypto transfers have been shown to be far cheaper – for example, sending money via Bitcoin/Ethereum was ~96% cheaper than using banks . This means more aid money goes to people instead of banks, aligning with UN goals to reduce remittance costs .
    • Faster Transfers: Bitcoin transactions clear in minutes, 24/7, whereas SWIFT bank wires can take days (and won’t process on weekends/holidays) . In emergencies, this speed is invaluable for the UN to mobilize funds immediately.
    • Global and Borderless: Bitcoin isn’t tied to any one country, so it flows across borders without the hurdles of currency exchange or sanctions (provided it’s used within legal bounds). Funds can reach places cut off from the global banking network, enabling the UN to bypass local banking failures or political roadblocks in crisis zones .
    • Financial Inclusion: Anyone with a smartphone and internet can receive or spend Bitcoin, no bank account or credit history needed. This is a game-changer for millions of unbanked people the UN serves – refugees, rural communities, and the poor can be included in the digital economy with a simple mobile wallet .
    • Control and Security: Bitcoin’s decentralized network is highly secure and cannot be arbitrarily frozen by authorities. For the UN, this means critical funds for a project can’t be held up by a bank or government decision. The cryptographic security of blockchain ensures that transactions, once confirmed, are extremely difficult to fraudulent reverse or tamper with .
    • Transparency: All movements of funds on Bitcoin’s blockchain are transparent. This can enhance oversight, as discussed – a clear improvement over opaque traditional banking where money can get lost in transit. Public accountability could strengthen donor confidence in UN financial management .

    Challenges and Considerations:

    • Volatility of Value: Bitcoin’s price can swing wildly. A donation of 1 BTC might be worth $50,000 one month and $30,000 the next. This poses a risk for the UN in budgeting and for beneficiaries who need predictable purchasing power. (One solution is to convert to stable-value assets or use stablecoins pegged to USD for actual disbursement , but the extra step adds complexity.)
    • Regulatory and Legal Hurdles: Many countries have strict regulations on cryptocurrencies – some even ban them. The UN must navigate a patchwork of laws and would need host country buy-in to use Bitcoin for programs. Compliance (KYC/AML) is also a concern, as cryptocurrencies can be used illicitly if not properly monitored . The UN would have to implement safeguards to prevent fraud and money laundering when using Bitcoin.
    • Technical Infrastructure & Literacy: Using Bitcoin requires internet access, electricity, and some technical know-how. In the world’s least developed or disaster-hit areas, connectivity can be limited. The UN would need to invest in digital infrastructure and community education so that people can actually use crypto on the ground. However, mobile phone penetration is rising even in poor regions, and the UN could build user-friendly tools or partner with fintech providers to bridge the tech gap.
    • Irreversibility and Security Risks: Bitcoin transactions are irreversible – if funds are sent to the wrong address or if a wallet is compromised, there’s no central authority to undo it. This raises the stakes for secure handling. The UN would need robust security practices for managing private keys (essentially the password to crypto funds) and perhaps insurance against losses. Cybersecurity would become a top priority, as hackers might target humanitarian crypto accounts.
    • Acceptance and Convertibility: While Bitcoin is global, it’s not universally accepted as payment on the local level. Aid recipients might still need to convert Bitcoin into local currency to buy food or pay rent. This requires local exchanges or vendors who support crypto, which might not exist everywhere. The UN might have to set up facilities to help people convert or spend crypto in local markets (as UNHCR did by leveraging MoneyGram locations for cash-out in the Ukraine pilot ).
    • Environmental Impact: Bitcoin mining (the process that secures the network) consumes a lot of energy – comparable to some countries’ electricity usage . For an organization championing sustainable development, this is a valid concern. The UN would likely encourage the use of greener blockchain innovations or carbon offsets if it were to adopt Bitcoin at scale. (It’s worth noting that newer blockchain technologies and even Bitcoin’s own shift to renewable mining are addressing this issue, but it remains a consideration.)

    Despite these challenges, none are insurmountable. The UN has a history of tackling complex global problems, and the key would be to mitigate risks (with strong policies, pilot programs, and technical support) while harnessing the massive benefits Bitcoin offers. As one UNDP official suggests, it may require new regulatory frameworks and safeguards, but it’s possible to “allow cryptocurrencies to contribute positively to human development” without compromising stability . In other words, with the right approach, the pros can far outweigh the cons.

    Conclusion: A Visionary Path Forward

    In an increasingly digital world, Bitcoin presents a bold opportunity for the United Nations to modernize its financial toolkit in service of its global mission. By leveraging Bitcoin, the UN could move money faster, stretch donor dollars further, and reach people who’ve been left out of the traditional banking system. Imagine refugees in a war zone receiving emergency cash on their phones the same day a relief fund is approved – no banks, no fees, no delay. Envision a future where every donor can trace their contribution, in real time, to the village or clinic that uses it, fostering a new level of trust in international aid. Bitcoin’s blockchain can make these visions a reality. It embodies the spirit of innovation that the UN has increasingly shown, from the WFP’s blockchain food vouchers to UNICEF’s CryptoFund investments.

    Of course, adopting Bitcoin would be a journey of careful steps – pilot projects, capacity building, and collaboration with governments and tech partners. But the potential rewards are immense. It aligns with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (like reducing remittance costs and boosting financial inclusion) and opens doors for creative financing solutions in development and climate projects. The move towards using Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies could inspire a wave of financial empowerment across the developing world, much like mobile phones leapfrogged old communication barriers. It’s a chance for the UN to lead by example in the 21st century, embracing cutting-edge tools to solve age-old problems.

    In summary, the UN’s use of Bitcoin could streamline operations, enhance transparency, and deliver aid more effectively than ever before – truly a transformative leap. It is a visionary path, one that carries challenges, but with thoughtful implementation it could amplify the UN’s positive global impact. The message is an optimistic one: by harnessing Bitcoin’s innovations, the United Nations can write a new chapter in financial cooperation – one where help knows no borders and every resource finds its way to those who need it most. 

  • True warriors don’t battle with no one

    The funny irony is that if you think about like the Apex of Warrior, Achilles… He had like zero interest in battle. He was weird from battle, he was tired and sick of it, and just wanted to go back home to his own home, his own food field, and just chill with breisis his prize .

    She was only unsuspectingly lured back into battle, with Hector, and truth be told he didn’t even care to care to kill all those Trojans. Rather, she just killed all those Trojans in order to get to Hector, in order to get his sweet sweet revenge. Just as good old homer says, sweeter than honey.

    I think the strange thing is in today’s world, to be or become a hero is worshiped. Everyone wants to be like a Captain America or some sort of marvel superhero. This becomes a little bit problematic because now that Disney owns everything, but that that means is, all of these fake notions of being a warrior is commoditized into some sort of Package. And as a consequence, none of it is actually very unique nor powerful.

    Also, this also then becomes problematic because everyone wants to become some sort of hero, and in order to stake their claim, what they then need to do is find some sort of cause to fight for. And as a consequence, people get roped into all these weird movements, all these strange battles to fight for, like fighting for the planet, animals, human rights, poverty and inequality etc. but once again, what if the world doesn’t need your help? What if the world is just fine the way it is, or actually… What if in fact, the world is genuinely superior without you meddling in it. ?

    Then I suppose then, the next logical step is to just focus on yourself, and just leave other people alone and let them do their weird stuff. As time goes on, I am becoming less opinionated about the degenerate activities of others, just let them be, And also a funny thought to is, a lot of who I consider to be bad and degenerate, there is some sort of hidden wisdom to what they are doing and I just don’t know it?

    I suppose this is then a humbling thing because what that that means is that, other people might be more wise than me without me even knowing it?

    Then the idea is to respect the wisdom of others, and realize that in fact, you may be the fool? 

  • Why Cambodia makes sense

    So assuming that you’re like a foreigner, I’m like pretty certain that Cambodia is like the best place to be. This is my thinking and rationale:

    First, it’s kind of like harmony of man and nature. Something that is like not promoted in the traditional world.

    Second, people are just like way happier. I think it’s the effect of Buddhism, as well as the rich cultural heritage of Khmer culture.

    Third, it’s like extremely well equipped. Everyone speaks English, everyone uses US dollars, and telegram is like the new amazing game changing messaging app. I really don’t not like iMessage, but telegram is like super insanely awesome.

    Also, Internet connectivity here is great. And it will keep getting better.

    For example, I’m sure that soon, 5G penetration will happen soon.

    Also, even though politics seems chaotic, I actually think that the Prime Minister of Cambodia, is very intelligent incurring an independent economic future for Cambodia. It is my vision that Cambodia actually embraces bitcoin and creates a bitcoin strategic reserve in order to bolster the strength of the Khmer riel, instead of the US dollar.