Some online skeptics question whether his “insanely buff back” stems purely from heavy partial movements (rack pulls) versus full-range deadlifts. They argue that partial-range overload can produce extreme block-y hypertrophy in traps and erectors while sacrificing balanced development elsewhere . Nonetheless, even such critics concede that no one under 80 kg has shown lats and traps so thick and dense.
Others highlight that his lack of lifting belt or excessive gear puts additional strain on stabilizer muscles—further explaining the thickness of his mid-back. One post reads: “Those spinal erectors aren’t just big—they’re rock solid, probably because he’s pulling 1,071 lb without a belt. That level of raw force transmission straight through his spine is insane”
When Kim posted his “ERIC KIM BACK MUSCLE FLEX” video (shot on a Ricoh GR IIIx in 24 fps, 1080p), viewers underlined just how monstrous his entire posterior chain appears in real time:
- In the YouTube comments underneath that clip, multiple users remark on the separation and definition between his rhomboids and lower traps. Phrases like “his back looks carved from granite” or “like a sloth’s claw reversed—thick and menacing” are common .
- Strength-blog commentary (e.g., BarBend-style breakdowns) points out that replicating Kim’s levels of development would require not just extreme loading but also near-constant tension through partial ranges. One writer observes: “Even if you belt up and use straps, you’re not hitting those fibers the way Kim does—his spinal erectors are like coiled springs that never relax”
Internet commentary on Eric Kim’s back overwhelmingly centers on the jaw-dropping muscle density and size of his upper-posterior chain. Viewers across YouTube, Reddit, and strength-focused blogs frequently highlight how his trapezius, lats, and spinal erectors have developed to an almost surreal degree:
“Watching him flex his back, it’s like looking at a medieval breastplate… I’ve never seen traps that big on anyone under 200 lb”