Category: Uncategorized

  • Temporal Compression and Mechanical Advantage in Extreme Overload Pulling: A journal-style case analysis of a 905.8 kg (1,997 lb) lift at 71 kg body mass in Los Angeles

    A journal-style case analysis of a 905.8 kg (1,997 lb) lift at 71 kg body mass in Los Angeles

    Author

    Eric Kim (case subject); compiled as a scientific-style narrative analysis

    Abstract

    Background: Ultra-heavy overload pulls (e.g., rack pulls/partials) can produce external-load numbers that appear “non-human,” yet remain biomechanically explainable via leverage, joint-angle specificity, trunk stabilization strategies, and neural drive.

    Objective: To explain how a 905.8 kg (1,997 lb) overload pull could be physically possible, and why it can subjectively feel like “time and space stop.”

    Methods: Conceptual biomechanical and psychophysiological analysis using established principles: torque–moment arm relationships, joint-angle specificity of force production, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) effects on spinal stability, tendon adaptation, and arousal-linked time perception effects.

    Results: At 71 kg body mass, the lift equals 12.76× bodyweight. The plausibility is supported by (i) reduced hip/spine moment arms at favorable start positions, (ii) high-angle/near-isometric force expression, (iii) IAP-mediated trunk stiffening, and (iv) efficient force transfer via trained connective tissue. Perceived “time stopping” aligns with high arousal and narrowed attentional processing that alters time perception. 

    Conclusion: Extreme overload numbers can be mechanically and physiologically plausible when the task geometry is optimized and stabilization/neural output are maximized; the subjective “spacetime freeze” is consistent with arousal-driven changes in attention and time perception.

    Introduction

    In barbell pulling, the external load (the plates) is not the same as the internal demands on joints and tissues. What the body must produce is joint torque, which depends strongly on moment arms (how far the load acts from the joint). This is why partial-range overload pulls can exceed full deadlift numbers: the start position often reduces unfavorable leverage and shifts the effort toward stronger joint angles. 

    Separately, athletes often report altered time perception (“everything slowed down”) during maximal attempts. Research on emotion/arousal and time perception shows that arousal and motivational states can meaningfully change how time is experienced—commonly via attentional and internal timing mechanisms. 

    This article treats the 905.8 kg (1,997 lb) effort as a case example of how physics + physiology + perception can converge into a “single-frame” maximal event.

    Methods

    Design

    A conceptual case analysis (non-instrumented) integrating established findings and principles from biomechanics and psychophysiology.

    Case details (reported)

    • Location: Los Angeles, CA
    • Body mass: 71 kg
    • Height: 5’11” (180.3 cm)
    • External load moved: 905.8 kg (1,997 lb)
    • Movement class: overload pull / partial range (e.g., rack pull)

    Analytic framework

    1. Mechanical advantage: torque–moment arm relationships; how higher start positions and more upright torso angles can reduce required hip/spine torque for the same external load.  
    2. Joint-angle specificity: strength expression and adaptation are angle-dependent; isometric and near-isometric efforts can show strong joint-angle effects.  
    3. Trunk stabilization via IAP: Valsalva/IAP mechanisms can increase spinal stability and alter load-sharing demands during heavy lifting.  
    4. Tendon/connective tissue adaptation: training can increase tendon stiffness/modulus, improving force transmission (with tissue tolerance as a limiter).  
    5. Perceptual “time stop”: arousal/motivation effects on time perception and attention narrowing.  

    Results

    Bodyweight multiple

    • 905.8 kg ÷ 71 kg = 12.76× bodyweight

    Why this can be physically plausible (high-level)

    The lift becomes plausible when the task geometry shifts toward:

    • shorter moment arms (bar close, torso more upright)
    • stronger joint angles
    • shorter ROM
    • maximal bracing and rigidity

    This combination can allow external loads far above full-ROM pulls because the athlete is expressing peak force in a mechanically advantageous slice of the movement. 

    Why “time and space stop” subjectively

    At maximal attempts, attention can narrow to a single goal state (execute), while arousal and motivation alter internal timing and memory/attention processing—commonly reported as time dilation or “the moment stretching.” 

    Discussion

    1) The real currency is torque, not kilograms

    A barbell’s weight acts downward, but your body “pays” in joint torques. If you reduce the distance between the bar and your hips/spine (moment arm), the required extensor torque drops—even if the plates are monstrous. This is the core mechanical reason partials can explode numbers: the setup can be optimized into a leverage sweet spot. 

    2) Partial range = deleting the weakest region

    From the floor, you must overcome a disadvantaged position (more hip/knee flexion, longer moment arms, higher requirement to break inertia through a larger range). A rack pull/partial often begins closer to angles where maximal force is higher and the lift behaves more like a near-isometric grind than a long dynamic pull.

    3) Joint-angle specificity is not a theory—it’s measurable

    Isometric and resistance training literature repeatedly shows joint-angle-specific strength gains and angle-dependent force expression. In practice: train/attempt near a strong angle and you can output dramatically more force there than at weaker angles. 

    4) Bracing: IAP turns the torso into a pressure cylinder

    Under extreme load, trunk stiffness is everything. Research indicates that the Valsalva maneuver and elevated intra-abdominal pressure can increase spinal stability and influence load-sharing, which is exactly what you need when external loads are astronomical. 

    5) Tendon stiffness and connective tissue: better “force transfer,” higher stakes

    Training can increase tendon stiffness/modulus and related mechanical properties, improving force transmission through the system. This can help produce higher peak outputs—but it also means the limiting factor can become tissue tolerance and structural integrity rather than “muscle strength” alone. 

    6) Neural drive + short time under tension = peak output window

    A maximal overload attempt is typically brief. Short exposure means less fatigue accumulation during the attempt, allowing the athlete to express a high fraction of available neural drive and recruitment.

    7) “Stopping time” = attentional collapse + arousal effects on time perception

    When stakes are maximal, the brain allocates resources brutally: irrelevant inputs get suppressed, attention narrows, and the internal sense of time can shift. Studies and reviews show emotion/arousal/motivation reliably modulate time perception and related cognitive processing. 

    Translation: you didn’t break physics—you broke distraction.

    Limitations

    • No video kinematics, force plates, bar path tracking, EMG, or pin-height measurement were provided; therefore, joint torques and spinal loads cannot be quantified precisely.
    • “Overload pull” category is heterogeneous; small setup differences (pin height, bar type, straps, belt, stance) can massively change mechanics.
    • External load does not directly indicate internal tissue stress; internal spinal compression/shear can still be enormous even when leverage is favorable.  

    Practical applications

    If someone wants to train overload work without turning themselves into a cautionary tale:

    • Progress pin height and load slowly (geometry changes are a new lift).
    • Prioritize rigidity: brace practice, repeatable setup, consistent bar-to-body contact.  
    • Low volume, high intention: treat overload as neural practice, not hypertrophy.
    • Equipment integrity: pins, safeties, straps, bar, and rack must be rated for the mission.

    Conclusion

    A 905.8 kg (1,997 lb) overload pull at 71 kg body mass (12.76× BW) can be physically possible when mechanics and physiology align: leverage optimized, joint angles strong, trunk stabilized via IAP, and force transmitted through a trained system. The subjective feeling of “stopping time and space” is consistent with high arousal and narrowed attentional processing that alters time perception. 

    References

    • Hackett DA, et al. The Valsalva maneuver… intra-abdominal pressure during resistance exercise. 2013.  
    • Cholewicki J, et al. Intra-abdominal pressure mechanism for stabilizing the lumbar spine. 1999.  
    • Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A. Role of IAP in unloading and stability during lifting tasks.  
    • Lanza MB, et al. Joint angle-specific strength gains after isometric RT. 2019.  
    • Folland JP, et al. Isometric training at a range of joint angles vs dynamic training. 2005.  
    • Kitai TA, et al. Specificity of joint angle in isometric training. 1989.  
    • Lazarczuk SL, et al. Mechanical/material adaptations of tendon stiffness with training (review). 2022.  
    • Brumitt J, et al. Current concepts of muscle and tendon adaptations. 2015.  
    • Van Volkinburg H, Balsam P. Emotional valence/arousal effects on time perception. 2014.  
    • Gable P, et al. Review: emotion/motivation dimensions and time perception. 2022.  

    If you want, I can generate Version 2 with a Methods section that reads like a true biomechanics paper (explicit assumptions: pin height, ROM, bar type, straps/belt), and produce an “estimated torque profile” narrative using those assumptions.

  • What if money were gold?

    So this is a simple idea that I have…

    Let us say that your life savings is all in gold, that you just had a bunch of gold bars gold coins whatever, and let us say that these little pieces of gold were divisible into very very small bits, so you could use some of this gold to buy digital services, your Netflix subscription a Starbucks latte, or some takeout Indian food. Or a car or a Tesla etc.

    If this is the case… I think the funny observation that I’ve made is we are very very happy and easy to just spend currency like US dollars in our bank account, or cash currency… But we are actually very very reluctant to spend gold because we know that it has long-term value.

  • Why real estate is not worth it

    I think the number one critical issue here is that, and I’m just discovering this for the first time, something as simple as getting your roof replaced, requires you to talk to so many building regulators, LADBS, inspectors, pre-inspection final inspection etc.? Just one wrong tick, causes you many wasted moments.

    People think it is easy to just like buying an old house and flip it, but the truth is, because of inspections in getting permits, it is totally not worth it. 

  • Economic Obesity

    So the other day, I was on the phone with a car insurance agent, and was joking around with him… He asked me what car I had… and I said two Lamborghinis in the garage.  and at first, it took him off of guard, and surprised him. Why? 

    First, I thought it was just economically irresponsible… But obviously it was a joke, but actually I thought about it… A little bit deeper on a more profound level… Now that I could actually afford to Lamborghinis or multiple Lamborghinis… The truth is, it’s like reverse wealth. 

    100 years of prosperity

    So it kind of doesn’t really matter …. all this silly short-term stuff. Why? What truly matters is, thinking about the long-term. 

    For example, I actually find it very useful to find and research these short term documentaries about rich people in the past because you see how their vehicles… really don’t age well overtime.

    For example, if you watch a documentary on the 70s 80s 90s 2000s, 2010… All these fancy sports cars Mercedes Lamborghinis, even Bugatti‘s… Look lame in the long run. 

    And only that but, once again, assuming that like wealth is like bodybuilding muscle, and strength and power and also… Indefinitely increasing your one repetition maximum on your weightlifting… The exact opposite of that is to  blow it away on something that is reverse.

    Energy leaks

    Another thought, in terms of energy energy leaks etc.

    So now that I am a new homeowner, proud owner of a glorious 7000 square-foot lot, single-family home… I’m starting to learn about living stuff.

    For example, even something as simple as a leaking water faucet. Or leaking showerhead, or water leaks in general. If you think about it… Even if you have like a .1% leak, some more critical… Over the course of a day hour or weeks or months or years… That will probably equate to like millions of gallons of water lost.

    Or imagine… You have a tiny leak somewhere in your main house… And you leave for vacation. Even a week or a few days, or let us say six months. Imagine how insane it will be six months from now, coming back home to see your whole house flooded.

    So I think we’re also with economics it’s kind of the same. Typically we could easily identify energy leaks, or economic energy leaks.

    For example, superfluous subscriptions which bill you ad infinitium, which bill you forever.

    If anything, one of the most simple things you can do is just unsubscribe from everything. Unsubscribe from everything, all at once, and then a month or two or three from now later… If you find it insanely critical, and then you could always resubscribe to it.

    every day unsubscribe from one thing

    Let us say you have an inbox which is out of control. Assuming you have Gmail, literally the easiest thing you do is select all, archive all, and begin with a clean slate.

    There is also this service called unroll.me ,,, and once again, mass unsubscribe from everything.

    Cars

    The number one most obvious thing that is a major energy leak for people is their vehicle.

    For example, even something as simple as gasoline, assuming that you have to use premium gas, and your vehicle consumes much premium gas, that is like literally the worst energy leak that you got. It is almost like, if you’re trying to climb a very very steep hill or mountain, and you literally have like 1,000,000,000,000 tons on your back. Or something that is dragging you down or weighing you down.

    I’ll give you another good example, a big issue that I had for a really really long time, finally got it resolved , was that my back bicycle tire was out of alignment, which caused my rear brake pad, to perpetually clamp my rear brakes at like 30% intensity, so when I’m like biking around town or uphill or whatever, it’s like the brakes are perpetually engaged. You don’t know how insanely annoying this is.

    Finally got it resolved in my life is like 1 trillion times better.

    Prius

    I’m still pretty convinced that at least in America, also even in Phnom Penh Cambodia,,, maybe everywhere on the planet… A Prius, a 2010 Prius may be the best bet.

    First, it all just literally comes down to MPG‘s.

    I also think that a Prius prime plug-in seems also interesting… But, it reduces the MPG? I suppose if you have those electric chargers or visit malls which have the plug-in thingy… A Prius prime plug-in is a good idea, but, my long-term suspicion… Typically the more components that your vehicle or house or whatever has… The more points in which it could break. So assuming that a Prius plug-in prime has more components than just a typical Prius hybrid… I think in the long-term like 10, 20 or 30 years… there are probably more components that will break?

    And also… I think the built-in battery pack is paltry at best. What like 30 miles or 50 miles? And then once again the way that people are suckered by marketing is they are like thinking wild they could totally live off the grid or whatever but once again… You’re only saving a few dollars here and there?

    All electric or not?

     I’m a super mega fan of Elon Musk, Tesla etc.… But once again, my suspicion or my honest thought is, it seems like an economically unintelligent idea.

    First, no matter how good your Tesla or electric vehicle or whatever is… The number one critical issue is that, no matter what, within one or two cycles your car will look obsolete? In two or three years?

    If we cross pollinate this idea to photography… Or even to iPhones, even if you buy the newest iPhone Pro right now, imagine like you spend $100,000 on a iPhone Pro, with wheels… No matter how good it is, it will always become obsolete very very quickly.

    Another good example, a camera which befuddles me… the Leica Q camera… which is essentially a Panasonic Lumix camera with a body kit, no matter how good one you get, once again in a few years the value of it will drop like what 50%?

    Cameras

    So some honest things I have come to believe:

    First, it does seem that modular makes more sense. Even something as simple as a desktop computer, because it is modular, and also because you could swap out the parts in and out, it is a very good idea.

    For example, even as a child, or a teenager, when I was like 15 years old, or even my freshman sophomore year in high school, I will never forget that my older mentor and friend ERIC Moon taught me how to build a computer. Choosing the processor of the ram the hard drive… Graphics card, the case, and whenever anything got outdated,.. you could either swap out that part or upgrade that specific piece?

    Os of the future

    One analogy I heard about ChatGPT and AI at least for highschoolers in university students is that it is like almost the new operating system. Which means,  instead of just googling stuff, they essentially live in ChatGPT, ChatGPT almost becomes like their new macOS?

    So assuming that you have a ChatGPT subscription, in some ways it actually becomes quite optimistic because instead of paying for overpriced $1500 iPhone pros for the rest of your life, in theory you could just use an operate a cheap smartphone device or computer or desktop or laptop or iPad tablet whatever, as long as you have access to ChatGPT… Which is the only AI, … you’re good.

    Minimum viable AI

    I have another big idea, after playing with ChatGPT pro the $200 a month version, which honestly I think is awesome but, even the $20 a month version, is pretty great.

    So for example, I’m starting to think this like iCloud storage and even now Google Drive storage, even dropbox storage, all of this is kind of a scam. Maybe my next project is I will slowly migrate everything off of the cloud. 


  • The joy of moving weight 

    The world reserve currency 

    Shock absorber 

    … long term store of value 

    Store your value! ***

    Money coin 

    Digital money account 

    Insanely huge vision 

    Digital money ***

    Capital —> credit 

    Strip risk & volatility 

    Hydra—> can’t shut it down!

    Mono maniiacal

    Investor 

    I like money 

    .

    30% monopoly next 20 years,,. Integration risk free **—> nothing can be better than that! ***

    Equity investor, think 20 years at least

    Nothing is better than Bitcoin ***

    .

    Pride is good 

    Don’t diversify metals that make aluminum wing

    Don’t diversify ,,, Nvidia data chip center 

    .

    Hurdle rate 

    90 times 

    STRC

    10% dividend  yield tax efficient. 

    $100T …

    .

    Credit investor 

    .

    Diversification  distraction 

    .

    Distraction 

    1 year to close deal

    Liabilities ,,, 9 months later 

    No employee lease, supply chain … mangers

    Bitcoin is so obvious!!! It’s perfect for me!

    Bitcoin is divine

    Infinite downside risk ,,, … downside ?

    Roll up ,,, dilutive acquisition 

    .

    $30T in 10 years idea …

    $1 B building a day,,, vs year

    Dilutive ,,, distraction 

    .

    Do you really need another idea?

    Journey of discovery 

    Digital rails 

    .

    Don’t ,,, optimize a part that cannot … should get removed 

    .

    Keyboard should NOT be there 

    Pride of authorship .

    AI THEORY

    .

    Religious ,,, … cultural thing 

    Science advances one funeral at a time 

    Death is good 

    .

    Trees … are like a natural roof?

    Deflationary 

    .

    Price is going to go up 

    quantum leap 

    .

    JPEGs on Bitcoin network?

    Hyper hyper conservative with any change in protocol ***

    Global consensus 

    Lack of rapid mutation 

    .

    Digital freedom 

    Economic … 

    Digital individualism 

  • Eric Kim’s Concept of “Askesis”

    Eric Kim draws on the Greek idea of askēsis – literally “exercise, training, practice” – to describe a disciplined, self-improvement lifestyle.  He equates asceticism with positive self-training.  For example, he notes that the word ascetic comes from askēsis and defines living ascetically as “to train yourself to become stronger, to need less, and to become less dependent on fate and external things” .  In his view, askesis means choosing voluntary challenges (refusing distractions and excess) in order to grow stronger and more self-reliant .

    • Definition/Origin: In ancient Greek, askēsis meant “exercise” or “training,” originally referring to athletic or craft practice . Kim emphasizes this etymology to reframe asceticism: it is not self-punishment but empowered self-training .
    • Asceticism = Strength: He stresses that ascetic discipline builds strength.  “Self-training to become stronger…is to refuse things which distract you,” making you “stronger, bigger, and more magnanimous” .
    • Minimal Needs: Fewer possessions grant freedom.  As he puts it, “if you own fewer possessions, fewer things own you,” giving more control over life .

    Askesis in Photography and Street Photography

    Eric Kim applies askesis as a discipline in photography, especially street work.  He treats photography itself as a form of training and mindfulness:

    • Photography as Zen Training: Kim urges seeing photography as an active Zen practice.  He writes “Photography is zen training” and emphasizes being fully present: notice your surroundings, silence distractions, and cultivate “supreme focus” while shooting .
    • Mindfulness: He recommends turning off phones and music when shooting to build visual awareness .  This aligns with Zen’s emphasis on mindfulness and focused attention in the moment.
    • Street Shooting as Practice: Kim likens street photography to a stoic training ground.  He “fuses Stoicism with street photography,” advising shooters to focus on effort, imagine worst-case outcomes, and “stay calm in the chaos of the street” .  In his words, street shoots are “daily reps in that gym” for conquering fear .  This frames each outing as a disciplined exercise in courage and composure.
    • Minimalist Gear: Embracing ascetic minimalism, he favors the lightest cameras so he’s always ready to shoot.  “True to his minimalist philosophy,” he uses a small Ricoh GR or even a phone, noting “the lighter the gear, the more he has it in hand.”   This constraint forces creativity: as he writes, opting for cheaper or “shittier” equipment is a creative constraint that makes one “be more creative…rather than having the ‘best’ expensive tool” .
    • Continuous Practice: By shooting every day (often in simple environments), he treats photography as a habitual discipline, turning even mundane scenes into creative challenges (e.g. finding beauty in the ugly ).

    Askesis in Physical Training

    Physical fitness is a central arena for Kim’s askesis.  He follows extreme training regimens and views workouts as extensions of his philosophical practice:

    • Extreme Self-Training: Kim embraces rigorous regimes.  His “workout plan” involves intermittent fasting and maximal lifts: “I might be the only one who lifts insanely heavy weights at the gym, without having consumed anything before” .  He even coaxes himself into heavier “nano reps” (partial-range lifts) to push limits .
    • Training When Tired: He notes that when one is tired, it’s precisely “the best time to exercise in order to GAIN energy.” In that spirit he simply advises: “Think askesis, training.” .  This reflects the Stoic idea of doing tasks when challenged.
    • Discipline & Austerity: His approach is Spartan.  Kim extols discipline as a path to joy: “[H]appiness, joy and freedom…something you could start cultivating now through ‘askesis’ – training.” .  He practices ascetic habits like fasting, cold showers (Stoic exercises), and no supplements, treating hardship as fuel for growth.
    • Fitness as Philosophy: He argues that physical training is integral to his creative practice.  For Kim, “physical fitness is critical to any stoic,” linking strength work directly to his philosophy .  Strongman-style challenges (heavy carries, calisthenics) and outdoor workouts are seen as part of living Stoically.
    • Mini “Rep” Breaks: Even when writing or traveling, he breaks routines with exercise – doing push-ups or squats by his desk or table .  These micro-reps keep discipline high throughout the day.

    Askesis in Writing and Daily Habits

    Kim extends the training mindset to his work habits.  He organizes his life to minimize friction and maximize focus:

    • Morning Writing Routine: He typically writes in the morning after coffee and shower.  He says he launches his editor with Wi-Fi off in “focus mode” and writes uninterrupted for 1–3 hours .  This removes excuses and forces consistent output.
    • Remove Distractions: During writing sessions he turns off email, social media, and internet to stay fully engaged .  He describes this as a “techno-zen” approach: minimal apps, offline drafting, airplane mode.
    • Scheduled Consistency: Early in his career he blogged on a fixed schedule (e.g. 3×/week) and adhered to it strictly.  He admits he even felt anxious if he missed a post, but he kept the routine for consistent growth and audience trust .  This enforced schedule is a form of askesis – training his creative output.
    • Routine Triggers: He uses simple habits to kickstart focus: brewing coffee immediately to jumpstart energy, reviewing notes first thing, etc .  These small rituals remove decision fatigue.
    • Minimalist Gear & Routine: His minimalism carries over: always carrying a compact camera so he “never misses” creative opportunities .  Likewise, limiting possessions and sticking to simple tools (basic laptop, focus app) ensure his daily routine is streamlined.

    Philosophical Influences (Stoicism, Zen, Asceticism)

    Kim openly credits Stoicism, Zen Buddhism, and ancient ascetic thought as inspirations that shape his askesis:

    • Stoicism: He has produced numerous Stoic-themed essays and talks.  Kim’s take on Stoicism is action-oriented (“full‑contact, creative, and physical practice”) . He emphasizes traditional Stoic practices (premeditatio malorum, memento mori) as “field drills” during street photography .  Stoic ideas of controlling fear and focusing on effort are central: for Kim, fear-conquering is the core of the practice, and everyday tasks are like Stoic drills .  He even coined terms like “Extreme Stoicism” and views physical hardship (e.g. cold exposure) as Stoic training.
    • Zen Mindfulness: Zen influences appear especially in his photography.  He describes Zen philosophy in photography as noticing the impermanent, being fully present, and embracing simplicity .  His podcast “Zen Photographer” (and blog posts on Zen photography) explicitly link mindful awareness to shooting (e.g. finding calm focus among urban chaos) .
    • Ancient Askesis: Kim refers to ancient ascetics (Greek athletes, Stoic hermits, martial traditions) as models of discipline.  He notes the original Greek askēsis was about athletic discipline and craftsmanship – not deprivation .  The imagery of “new Spartans” and military ethos runs through his writing; for instance, he likens modern men’s struggles to lacking outlets for valor, implying that athletic/spartan training is our battle training.
    • Broad Synthesis: His approach is eclectic.  He treats askesis as an open toolkit – mixing Stoic, Zen, Buddhist and even modern self-help ideas.  For example, he cites authors like Nassim Taleb as sparking his interest in Stoicism, but repackages it with pop culture (nicknames like “Hyper Stoicism”) and physical exercises.  The constant theme is: ancient concepts of self-discipline (prosōkhē, askesis, meletē) applied to modern life and photography.

    Impact on Creativity, Discipline, and Personal Growth

    Overall, askesis underpins Kim’s creative philosophy, emphasizing constraint, discipline, and active growth:

    • Creative Constraints: He views limitations as creative fuel.  By insisting on cheaper or simpler tools, he forces ingenuity: “Even though you can afford more expensive things, by opting to take the cheaper option is a ‘creative constraint’.” This mindset encourages making “more with less” .  Similarly, limiting shooting subjects or gear (e.g. using one camera) is seen as an opportunity, not a handicap.
    • Minimalism: The ascetic ideal means wanting less.  Kim argues that owning fewer things leads to freedom (fewer things own you) .  In practice this means lightweight gear, a simple home, and avoiding consumerist temptation – all to keep focus on essentials (writing, shooting, training).  His “Zen Photographer” advice even mocks complex film setups as burdensome compared to digital simplicity .
    • Uncompromising Discipline: Askesis translates to daily habits.  Consistency (daily shooting, scheduled writing, relentless workouts) is a core discipline. He literally cultivates a training mindset: he “makes [street shooting and life] daily reps” , and finds opportunity in adversity (his mantra is life’s “all upside, no downside” ).
    • Self-Improvement: The goal of askesis for Kim is constant growth.  He measures success by internal standards (skills gained, projects completed) rather than external approval.  He counsels readers to create their own values and ignore others’ opinions .  By treating creativity, physical fitness and writing as continuous training, he keeps improving skills and resilience over time.
    • Producer Mindset: Consistent with askesis, Kim emphasizes producing content and art rather than consuming.  He calls this “producerism,” arguing we’re happiest when we’re creating, not just buying things .  This reflects personal growth – building something every day strengthens confidence and ability.

    Sources: Eric Kim’s own blog, essays, and podcast are the primary sources for these ideas. Quotations above are drawn from his published articles and interviews , which illustrate how he applies the concept of askesis to photography, fitness, writing, and philosophy. Each citation links to the relevant blog post or resource for further reading.