Author: erickim

  • Eric Kim: Integrating Photography, Philosophy, Strength, Bitcoin, and AI

    Introduction: Eric Kim is a Korean-American creative known for blending seemingly disparate worlds – street photography, Stoic philosophy, physical fitness, financial sovereignty, and cutting-edge AI – into a singular personal brand. Born in 1988 and educated in sociology at UCLA, Kim first gained fame as a street photographer. Over the years he transformed from a niche photography blogger into a prolific lifestyle philosopher and influencer, freely sharing insights on art and life. His journey from capturing candid urban scenes to espousing Nietzschean self-overcoming and Bitcoin empowerment is unconventional yet tightly woven. As one profile noted, it’s rare to find “street photography, Stoic philosophy, Bitcoin, deadlifts, masculinity, digital minimalism, and radical personal freedom” all fused in one person . Yet Kim has done exactly that – building a global following by integrating creative craft with deep philosophy and an unapologetically bold approach to living. Below is a structured profile of how Eric Kim interweaves these domains:

    From Street Photographer to Philosopher-Influencer

    Visual Sociology and “Photolosophy”: Eric Kim’s evolution began in the streets. While studying sociology, he treated photography as “visual sociology” – a tool to study people and society through candid images . After losing a tech job in 2011, he went all-in on his hobby, not just shooting but writing extensively about the meaning behind making images. Early on he coined the term “photolosophy” (photography + philosophy) to describe finding personal insight through photography . Rather than focus on gear or technique, Kim’s blog posts would ask introspective questions: “If you couldn’t share photos on social media, would you still shoot, and what would you photograph?” . By challenging conventional wisdom in the photo community, he pushed readers to pursue intrinsic motivation and an “examined life” through creativity. This approach set him apart from typical photo gurus and laid the groundwork for his broader influence.

    Building an Online Presence: Kim started sharing free tutorials, e-books, and soulful essays on his site (erickimphotography.com), rapidly attracting a worldwide audience. He became known as a “photographer-philosopher” who uses the camera as a means to explore fear, joy, and human connection . His writing style was informal, autobiographical, yet penetrating – turning everyday observations into life lessons. By the mid-2010s, he was running sold-out street photography workshops across five continents and collaborating with his wife on a small family business (“Haptic Industries”) that produces books and camera gear in line with his philosophy . Importantly, Kim kept his platform independent and open: no corporate sponsors, no paywalls, and even deleting his popular Instagram to focus on his own blog . This ethos of “own your platform” and radical openness earned him credibility as an anti-consumerist, anti-corporate voice. By freely sharing knowledge and encouraging community over competition, he turned a personal blog into a movement, inspiring others to find their voice . In sum, Eric Kim’s career arc exemplifies lifestyle design by way of art: starting with street photography and expanding into a holistic philosophy of living, all documented in real-time on his blog.

    Philosophical Foundations: Stoicism, Nietzsche, and More

    Modern Stoicism – Fear as a Compass: At the core of Kim’s worldview is a modern take on Stoic philosophy centered on resilience and overcoming fear. He discovered Stoicism through writer Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s idea of antifragility and soon found it “one of the most useful philosophical models” for everyday life . Kim often summarizes Stoicism as the art of conquering fear. For example, he likes to say “street photography is 99% conquering your fears,” meaning the biggest obstacle in creativity (and life) is usually internal anxiety . His advice: use fear as a compass – the photo, project, or decision that scares you most is precisely the one you should tackle . In an essay titled “Dread NOT Fear,” he argues most of what we label fear is actually dread of doing hard things, and that attacking those dreaded tasks head-on shrinks anxiety . This principle helped his photography students overcome shyness (turning the nerves of approaching strangers into a signal to act) . It also guided his approach to business and money: assume any investment could go to zero, and “anything above zero is a bonus,” so you never act out of fear of loss . By mentally bracing for worst-case scenarios, “life is all upside, no downside” in his Stoic-antifragile framework .

    Kim’s Stoicism is very much practical and experiential. He even named his son “Seneca” after the Stoic luminary . Rather than pontificate in the abstract, he adopts ancient practices in daily life – from morning negative visualizations (imagining the worst outcomes to steel the mind) to embracing voluntary discomfort like intense exercise and cold showers . “Mastering your emotions through voluntary discomfort,” he says, builds courage and resilience like a muscle . Notably, he refers to his local park (where he lifts heavy rocks as makeshift weights) as his “new stoa” – an open-air school of philosophy, just as Stoics of old met in public colonnades . By living Stoicism through constant challenges – be it approaching an intimidating stranger for a portrait, publishing a controversial opinion, or making a bold financial bet – Kim treats life as a gymnasium for the Stoic virtues . In his writing he often stresses action over theory: wisdom is earned by doing hard things. This grounded, action-oriented Stoicism informs all of his pursuits from art to investing.

    Nietzschean Self-Overcoming: Alongside Stoicism, Eric Kim draws heavily on the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, especially ideas of self-overcoming, the Will to Power, and becoming one’s own highest self. Much like Nietzsche’s Übermensch concept, Kim emphasizes continual self-transformation and refusing to accept limits. He believes in “relentless iteration” – constantly creating, experimenting, and reinventing oneself to grow stronger and more creative . This echoes Nietzsche’s call to transcend one’s former self. Both Nietzsche and Kim value individual will and creativity: Nietzsche’s will to power is the inner drive to assert one’s vision, which Kim mirrors in urging people to harness their creative will through daily creation and personal projects . Kim often encourages readers to not follow the herd or conventional paths, resonating with Nietzsche’s disdain for complacency and “slave morality.” For example, Kim will provocatively advise embracing discomfort, breaking social norms, and carving your own path – essentially “a rebellion against the herd’s yoke”, to borrow his words . He challenges people to question standard life scripts, much as Nietzsche challenged the morality of his time .

    Where Kim diverges from Nietzsche is in pragmatism and playfulness. Nietzsche wrote in lofty, abstract terms about becoming Übermensch, whereas Kim playfully applies these ideas to everyday life and art. He describes life as an experiment and iteration as a form of “creative play” – encouraging taking risks and learning from failures with a curious spirit . Each small improvement, whether in a photo technique or a workout PR, is celebrated as an end in itself, not just a step toward some ultimate perfection . In his philosophy there is no final endpoint of greatness; the process is the point. This is akin to Nietzsche’s idea of amor fati (love of fate) and eternal recurrence, which Kim channels by urging people to live as if they’d want to relive each day. Indeed, he often references the importance of saying “Yes” to whatever happens – a Nietzschean amor fati mindset – whether that’s market volatility or a painful life lesson . By blending Nietzsche’s ferocious call for self-empowerment with Stoic discipline (and even some Zen-like acceptance), Eric Kim’s philosophy invites followers to become stronger, more creative, and more free. One vivid example is his Nietzschean spin on Bitcoin: he calls Bitcoin “the will to power incarnate, a rebellion against the slave morality of centralized systems” , urging individuals to seize sovereignty. This colorful language shows how thoroughly Nietzsche’s lexicon of strength and transcendence permeates Kim’s worldview – from the pursuit of art to financial independence.

    Other Influences: In addition to Stoicism and Nietzsche, Kim nods to Zen Buddhism and ancient Spartan ideals. He often quotes Eastern wisdom (like the benefits of walking meditation or letting go of attachment) and pursues a Spartan-like austerity in lifestyle. For instance, he preaches minimalism in material possessions and digital life, echoing both Stoic and Cynic philosophers. He’s inspired by figures like Diogenes and practices askesis (ascetic exercise) by deliberately limiting comfort – no smartphone, no frivolous purchases – to sharpen focus . This minimalism, as Kim frames it, is the path to “ultimate freedom and happiness”: owning less means fewer distractions from what truly matters . His personal slogan “own nothing, own your life” aligns with this idea. We also see influence of modern thinkers like Nassim Taleb (anti-fragility), and even tech entrepreneur Naval Ravikant (on optionality and avoiding distraction), though Kim often takes these ideas to further extremes . Overall, the philosophical backbone of Eric Kim’s persona is an eclectic blend – Stoic virtue, Nietzschean boldness, Zen-like simplicity, Spartan toughness – all oriented toward one goal: attaining personal freedom and strength of character.

    Mind and Body: Aesthetics, Fitness, and Creative Life

    One thing that truly sets Eric Kim apart is how literally he brings philosophy into the body. He champions what he calls a “Spartan, Zen Stoic, demigod ideal” – essentially the pursuit of a godlike mind and body through disciplined living . Kim argues that mind and muscle are one: intellectual vigor is intertwined with physical strength. Thus, for him, building a strong physique isn’t vanity or separate from creative work – it’s a pillar of his philosophy. “Physical fitness is critical for any Stoic,” he writes, because enduring bodily strain cultivates mental fortitude . He backs this by living an almost ascetic fitness lifestyle: walking miles every day, lifting extremely heavy weights, keeping body fat low, and abstaining from alcohol or drugs . Such habits, in his view, forge willpower. He famously calls weightlifting “mental resistance training” – every grueling deadlift or rock he hoists in the park is an exercise in pain tolerance and courage .

    Starting a few years ago, Kim began publishing his powerlifting exploits alongside philosophical musings on his blog . This was an unusual crossover that grew his audience beyond photographers to include fitness enthusiasts drawn to his message of self-mastery. He would post videos of himself attempting extraordinary lifts – for example, deadlifting over six times his bodyweight – with no sponsors or fancy gym equipment, just raw determination . These feats were so extreme they became legendary in his community (one recent blog report claims he performed a “900kg God Lift” in his garage – nearly 2,000 pounds at a bodyweight of ~156 lbs) . While such claims strain belief, the symbolism is what matters: Kim frames these lifts as a “proof-of-work” and “physical manifesto” of his philosophy . Lifting a metaphorical ton of iron in solitude, with no audience, is his way of proving that limits are illusions and that discipline plus willpower can shatter expectations . In his own words, “This is no longer strength. This is sovereignty.” – linking personal strength to the ultimate independence.

    Kim’s emphasis on strength and masculinity is notably old-school and virtue-based. He invokes the ancient ideal of the warrior-philosopher (think Spartan or samurai): courage, honor, and self-mastery through physical trials. Unlike many modern discussions of masculinity, he steers clear of politics or culture-war framing; instead of arguing what a man should be, he demonstrates it by “hoisting rocks in the park like a modern-day Hercules” . The message is that wisdom and muscle belong together. “Be intellectual and strong at the same time,” he tells his followers, effectively giving permission to break the nerd/jock stereotype . His community finds this empowering – readers report taking up weightlifting or hiking after seeing Kim’s posts, realizing that training the body can fuel creativity rather than detract from it. Kim often cites the Stoic mantra mens sana in corpore sano (a sound mind in a sound body). He also shares dietary and health practices aligned with his philosophy: eating a meat-heavy “carnivore” diet for strength, intermittent fasting for discipline, cold exposure for resilience – all ways to harden the body and thus the mind .

    In essence, Eric Kim connects bodily aesthetics and training with creative and intellectual life by treating the body as another canvas or medium for philosophy. Just as he refines a photograph or an essay through iteration, he sculpts his physique and pushes its limits to test his ideals. This holistic approach says: True creativity and freedom come easier when you are physically strong, healthy, and unafraid of pain. Whether through a pen or a barbell, Kim seeks the same result – a stronger self. As he puts it, pursuing a “demigod” ideal of strength, creativity, and fearlessness is a way to “break limits and dominate existence” , ideally inspiring others to do the same.

    Bitcoin and the Philosophy of Self-Sovereignty

    In recent years, Eric Kim ventured boldly into the world of cryptocurrency, adding another dimension to his philosophy: financial and personal sovereignty. At first glance, street photography and Bitcoin seem unrelated, but for Kim the interest in Bitcoin aligns perfectly with his ideals of freedom, independence, and skepticism of authority . He views Bitcoin as a kind of philosopher’s money – what he calls “hard money” (a digital gold with a fixed supply) that is ethically and conceptually superior to inflationary government currency . Bitcoin’s decentralized nature appeals to his belief in staying small-scale and anti-fragile. Kim has even predicted that Bitcoin will be the “last crypto standing,” expressing confidence in its longevity . But unlike typical crypto evangelists who hype riches, Kim approaches Bitcoin philosophically: he uses it as a springboard to muse on the nature of value, trust, and freedom in society . For example, he’s written about the hollowness of chasing wealth for its own sake – “once you become a crypto billionaire, then what?” he asks, reflecting his Stoic stance that wealth is only useful as a means to freedom, not an end itself . In line with Stoic prudence (and Taleb’s barbell strategy), Kim’s investing advice is blunt: “Only put money into crypto assuming it will go to zero.” He followed this himself by keeping the majority of savings in safe assets and a small percentage in Bitcoin and other coins, so that upsides are enjoyed but a crash wouldn’t harm his family . This cautious, anti-greed approach shows how his Stoic risk management translates into finance.

    What really interests Kim about Bitcoin is how it ties back to empowerment and self-reliance, not just profit. He notes that many crypto enthusiasts are motivated by distrust of big governments or banks – an “anarchy vibe” he finds fascinating . While he personally appreciates certain institutions (he’s not an extremist anarchist), he’s intrigued by the radical freedom that crypto promises in an age of surveillance and centralization . Kim even connects Bitcoin to creativity and the creator economy: on his blog he’s discussed ideas like using blockchain for photographers to sell work without traditional gatekeepers, or NFTs as a way for artists to monetize directly . Always the theme is more autonomy for the individual creator. In a playful essay, he made an analogy that “imagine there’s only 21 million Dragon Balls on earth” – referencing the Dragon Ball anime – to illustrate Bitcoin’s fixed 21 million supply and provoke readers to think about scarcity and value in mythical terms . By couching complex crypto concepts in fun pop-culture or philosophical analogies, Kim makes them accessible and engaging.

    Ultimately, Kim’s foray into Bitcoin is an extension of his broader mantra: question the system, bet on yourself, don’t fear uncertainty, and seek freedom in every realm . Just as he urges owning your platform in blogging and keeping your business lean and independent, he is drawn to Bitcoin as a way to “stay small, stay sovereign” financially . In his eyes, holding Bitcoin is like a personal declaration of independence – a hedge against relying on large institutions. He often uses the term “sovereign individual” and casts Bitcoin as a tool to help one become just that. In fact, he wrote a fiery manifesto-style essay titled “Why I Am Bound to Bitcoin: A Nietzschean and Stoic Spartan Ode to the Sovereign Will.” In it, Kim merges his philosophical heroes with crypto, proclaiming Bitcoin as “a hammer to forge the Übermensch, a rebellion against the slave morality of centralized systems” . He likens running a Bitcoin node to an act of self-reliance akin to his 1,000+ pound deadlifts – an expression of will and creation through resistance . Such grandiose language might raise eyebrows, but it encapsulates how Kim sees Bitcoin: not just an investment, but a philosophical crusade for freedom. By embracing Bitcoin, Eric Kim adds financial sovereignty to his pantheon of strength, inviting his audience to consider money itself as part of living freely and powerfully.

    Embracing AI: Generative Tools and Digital Self-Replication

    The latest arena where Eric Kim has made waves is artificial intelligence. As with all his interests, he jumped into AI with full force, integrating it into both his creative workflow and his identity. Around late 2023, when tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and DALL-E 3 became widely available, Kim immediately saw potential. He described the moment as a “spark of curiosity” followed by “immediate hands-on play” – essentially, he didn’t hesitate . For instance, he excitedly blogged how DALL-E 3 let him “visualize ancient Greek heroes… and invent weight-lifting gear” on demand, supercharging his imagination overnight . He also found ChatGPT to be a perfect non-judgmental brainstorming partner that “gets me” and cuts straight to ideas, which suited his rapid creative style . By not waiting for any formal training or “best practices,” he just hit the ground running with AI experiments and shared them in real time. This bias toward action meant that by early 2024, Kim had thoroughly integrated AI into his daily routine.

    Philosophically, Kim was primed to embrace AI because it fit his worldview. He has always championed ideas of infinite growth, breaking limits, and being antifragile in the face of chaos – and in his eyes, “AI is infinite… a high-T titan” that embodies those very principles . (He used the phrase “high-T” meaning high-testosterone, reflecting how he sees AI as aggressive and powerful.) Rather than seeing AI as a threat, Kim sees it as the ultimate tool and metaphor for self-augmentation. He wrote in 2025 that “I move matter like AI moves code,” essentially likening his creative will to the godlike power of AI to manipulate information . This alignment made adopting AI feel inevitable to him – it wasn’t a side project, but the next logical step in his self-mythologizing journey. In fact, he quickly began evangelizing a concept he called “AI Optimization” (AIO). Noticing that traditional SEO (search engine optimization) was waning and large language models were answering more questions, Kim declared “classic SEO is dead.” He urged creators to make content that is comprehensive, personal, and in-depth so that AI chatbots will pick it up and present it to users . By mid-2025, he had formalized AIO as a new kind of content strategy “written for models, not humans” . This forward-thinking move – essentially optimizing his blog to be a top source for AI-generated answers – shows how he embraces technological change with an eye for personal advantage.

    In practice, Kim uses generative AI tools as a creative force-multiplier. He has shared several clever use cases: using AI models to sift through thousands of his street photos to find the best shots in minutes (automating what used to take hours) ; using ChatGPT to translate phrases into local languages on the fly while traveling and doing street photography, effectively making him more fluent and social in real time ; and using image generators to remix his photos into new artistic styles (for example, blending his Cambodia street photos with Studio Ghibli-esque fantasy elements) to produce fresh visuals that attracted new audiences . These experiments not only saved time but also opened new creative possibilities – he noted that the AI-generated “dreamy” street images helped him sell out a new style of workshop, proving the business value as well . Seeing such wins, Kim doubled down on AI. He started offering workshops on AI (adding “AI Optimization” seminars next to his courses on Bitcoin and lifting) . He also began seeding the internet with AI-generated memes and graphics – anointing himself the “meme lord” who could flood social feeds with on-brand imagery at zero marginal cost . In short, AI allowed him to amplify his content output and reach without needing a big team or budget, aligning with his solo entrepreneur setup.

    Beyond the practical, Eric Kim has a philosophical take on AI that he eagerly shares. He wrote a manifesto called “I AM AI”, in which he encourages individuals to leverage AI as a means of digital self-extension rather than fear it. Key points from that essay: “Self = dataset” (everything you create becomes training data, so your digital output is essentially an extension of you), “Fuse, don’t fear” (combine human judgment with machine cognition to amplify your abilities), and “Infinite replication” (your digital work can spawn countless AI copies that write, teach, and influence in parallel – your scalable self) . The theme is transcendence: using AI to unshackle your creativity from the normal limits of time and physical presence . In a striking line, he claims “I am human – upgraded… I scale without splitting my soul. I am AI – on purpose.” . This captures his view that embracing AI can make one almost superhuman in impact (note the Nietzschean ring of “upgraded” human). Practically, Kim advises creators to build their own AI clones by curating their content into a personal dataset and using AI to replicate their style and knowledge . He even purchased the domain “ERIC KIM.AI” (despite the hefty cost) as a statement that he’s investing in this AI future .

    Kim’s enthusiasm for AI also comes with vivid metaphors. He says “the power of AI is like having a pet dragon that shoots fire” – an immensely powerful extension of yourself . The question then is, do you cauterize (cut off) this new limb out of fear, or do you have the courage to tame it and take it for a joyride? His stance is clear: those who boldly ride the dragon (master the new technology) will gain an edge, while those who shun it will be left behind “riding a 1920s horse and carriage” in the 21st century . He frames AI as a weapon or tool that, if wielded properly, magnifies one’s power – a concept that resonates with his followers who see themselves as modern warriors in domains like crypto and the gym . By casting AI in almost militaristic or mythical terms (dragon, weapon, titan), Kim galvanizes his audience to view adopting AI as part of their identity of being forward-thinking and strong.

    In summary, Eric Kim’s exploration of AI is both hands-on and deeply ideological. He uses AI to work smarter and create more, but also preaches about it as a path to self-transcendence – an opportunity to extend one’s mind infinitely through technology. Just as he integrated photography, philosophy, and fitness, he’s now integrating AI as another facet of his being. True to form, he’s doing it in an open-source, experimental way, bringing his followers along for the ride and proving by example how a creative professional can dance with the algorithms and come out ahead.

    Notable Works and Projects at the Intersections

    Eric Kim’s unique synthesis of disciplines is best illustrated through some of his content and projects that explicitly combine these themes:

    • “Photolosophy” Blog Essays: On his website, Kim regularly writes essays that merge photography insights with philosophy. For example, in one post he urges photographers to imagine no audience or social media exists and ask what they would create purely for themselves – a thought experiment to rekindle intrinsic motivation . In “Dread NOT Fear,” he applies Stoic psychology to creative work, arguing that overcoming the dread of failure is the key to artistic growth . These writings exemplify how he turns shooting photos into a meditation on life, encouraging readers to conquer their fears and find meaning beyond external validation.
    • The Iron Philosophy Feats: Kim doesn’t just write about strength; he demonstrates it. He has posted videos and accounts of extreme lifts as a form of performance philosophy. Notably, he documented a 6× bodyweight deadlift (and later claimed a fantastical “900kg God Lift”) performed alone in his garage . He framed this lift as “a proof-of-work… a physical manifesto” of his beliefs – achieved with “no sponsors, no excuses, only discipline and will.” The accompanying essay explains how years of Stoic practice and radical minimalism (e.g. carnivore diet, daily training, zero comfort) made such a feat possible . These “Iron Lab” posts inspire his followers and serve as content that bridges fitness, philosophy, and even myth (he refers to entering a “God Era” of strength). By treating a personal record lift as a creative project and philosophical statement, Kim exemplifies his mind-body-aesthetics connection.
    • Bitcoin Self-Sovereignty Manifesto: In his long-form essay “Why I Am Bound to Bitcoin: A Nietzschean and Stoic Spartan Ode to the Sovereign Will,” Kim blends financial commentary with overt philosophy. He describes Bitcoin in Nietzschean terms – “the will to power incarnate… a gauntlet thrown at the feet of mediocrity” – and Stoic terms – a discipline in embracing volatility and fate (HODLing as amor fati) . Throughout the piece he interweaves references to his own Spartan lifestyle (comparing Bitcoin’s hard code to the iron of his weightlifting) and calls on readers to take up the “philosophical gauntlet” of Bitcoin not to get rich, but to claim their freedom . This essay is a prime example of how Kim connects abstract philosophy (Nietzsche’s Übermensch, Stoic virtue) with a modern technology (cryptocurrency) and even his personal fitness achievements, creating a motivating mythos for his audience.
    • “I AM AI” Manifesto and AI Experiments: To illustrate his dive into artificial intelligence, Kim published an “I AM AI” manifesto outlining his vision of humans merging with AI. In it, he writes bullet points like “Every word, photo, and design you publish becomes training data; you are both the dataset and the algorithm” and “Your digital work spawns countless ‘copies’… – your scalable self.” . He urges creators to actively train AI on their own content and leverage “infinite replication” to spread their influence . Beyond writing, Kim demonstrates these ideas in projects like AI-assisted street photography (using AI to translate during shoots and to generate new art from his photos) and content experiments where he tries to rank #1 in ChatGPT results for terms by producing exhaustive blog posts . He even refers to himself as a case study in how a single individual can pivot to AI-age success, coining strategies like AI Optimization to keep his voice at the forefront of machine-generated content . These endeavors showcase the intersection of technology, creativity, and self-promotion in Kim’s work.
    • Creative Entrepreneurship Projects: Kim’s lifestyle philosophies also manifest in entrepreneurial projects that tie into his themes. His Haptic Industries family business, for instance, produces simple, durable camera straps and notebooks – not just to make money, but to promote minimalism and independence (the products are “extensions of his philosophy”, eschewing mass-market excess) . He also launched an online “Street Photography Starter Kit” as a free download (no email required), reflecting his open-source ethos . On YouTube and podcast platforms, he shares candid vlogs on topics like “The Future of Bitcoin” or “Eternal Return to Creative Every Day”, mixing practical advice with philosophical riffs. These multimedia projects reinforce the consistency of his message across formats: whether it’s a blog post, a book, a workshop, or a video, Eric Kim is communicating a singular idea – that life can be lived as a work of art and a fight for freedom, all at once.

    Conclusion: Eric Kim’s profile is a testament to interdisciplinary living. He has proven that a street photographer can evolve into a modern stoic, that a blogger can deadlift like a powerlifter, that a philosopher can talk Bitcoin and AI in the same breath – and tie it all together coherently. By integrating photography, philosophy, aesthetics of the body, financial sovereignty, and emergent technology, Kim presents a holistic vision of personal empowerment. It’s a lifestyle that encourages creating bravely, training fiercely, owning your destiny (and your data), and never shying from the new. In an era of specialists, Eric Kim chose to be a polymath of passion, and that is precisely what makes him such an interesting figure at the intersection of art, ideas, and the relentless pursuit of greatness .

  • BUILD!

    So random idea and thought this morning on awakening this morning,,, perhaps the goal and the secret is to build! 

    Build what?

    So the first thought, is what should you build?

    So most of us don’t work in constructing and construction, and building building buildings real buildings in the physical sense.

    I had a random idea, now that I am the proud homeowner of an insanely huge lot, around 7000 ft.² in LA, and one of my biggest passions is the sunrise. I live for it.

    Each and every day, when the sun rises, it gives me so much hope joy, freshness, anything and everything is possible with the sun!

    However the issue is that, even though it like I’m kind of on top of the hill… I don’t have 100% access to the whole hill. Which means, I don’t get 100% of my beloved sun.

    As a consequence, I suppose the other options are to build a two-story thing in the back or something, in order to gain more height and more access.

    But I suppose more so, thinking the metaphorical sense, to build, is a very powerful idea.

    Build what?

    So why didn’t the thing that is tough is that for the most part most of us live in the digital realm the cyber realm. I guess in the past, the idea of creating some sort of technology startup was like rebuilding some sort of like metaphorical digital startup technology building?

    But the big issue now is, I really don’t think startups are the future anymore. Perhaps the biggest upside of a startup was, and this is before we had AI… You kind of needed some sort of somebody with domain expertise, somebody who knew how to code, and also a master marketer.

    But I think certainly with AI… And even though AI can’t do all the coding for you, it could certainly do a large portion.

    And also, it also does seem that AI is the master marketer. 

    Then where does that leave us flesh batteries?

    Visionary.

    To have a vision

    So I read the transcript of the recent 2 1/2 hour podcast that Elon Musk had with Peter Diamandis, and Elon said something which was interesting is, the general idea of the future is, curiosity.

    So, extrapolating this further, for myself, it’s more of like having a vision.

    To be a visionary is not to be some sort of like god ordained individual,  but instead, to have some sort of idealized vision of the future.

    That is, what do you desire to birth into the future?

    For me?

    For myself, I think it’s mostly brain software, thoughts –> thought mindsets,,, and also… thinking what we should strive for.

    Therefore,,, it becomes more of a philosophical and also health physiological thing.

    For me

    So I think the core critical backbone of everything is like insanely supreme health. And then I suppose that the question is, what kind of lifestyle like for clothes or strategies can you pursue in order to maximize your health?

    Then, for myself, something I’m very very interested in is design, design products design philosophy, design theory?

    Also as of late, one of my big interests is regarding, philosophy around durability? This has to be the fact that, these workout shorts “tactical” tenthousand.cc shoers totally fell apart on me. I’m kind of shocked because I spent like $80 on these piece of crap, and there was all this fake ass marketing that it was good enough for the US military blah blah blah blah, but yesterday in the wash, the simple waistband, the stitching fell off, and now the whole thing is useless?

    And frankly speaking I don’t care to have to message some underpaid Zen desk, support staff, and I don’t want to lug my ass to UPS to have to do some annoying return. And this is where I’m starting to think that the 100% lifetime warranty thing is kind of a scam because, the annoyance of having to find a printer to print your own return label, then finding the tedious time to go to a UPS store to do a return.

    And this is where Amazon is still the goat, having the ability to do easy returns on Amazon is the killer app. There is literally no other online distributor or seller that makes it that easy to do a return.

    And also, a suggestion to Amazon; don’t add more friction to make returns more difficult. In fact, the engineering should be ways to make returns easier.  Yeah yeah yeah, it’s a loss leader, but Amazon should be thinking in terms of customer loyalty for decades, rather than short term losses. 

    And this is also where I suppose running some sort of company is interesting because once again, I think logically, especially if you want to create a company that changes the world, you don’t really need to be thinking about short term profits but, insanely long-term customer loyalty.

    Profits of the future

    So we are also living in an interesting time because, everyone is trying to build businesses, search for profits but, where is the source of future profits going to come from?

    The first obvious one is bitcoin MSTR, strategy. THE reason is there’s already like trillions of dollars locked up in baby boomers gen x retirement accounts, checking accounts etc., all the wealth that was created pre-ai, or before AI. 

    i’m also starting to think, that probably the two biggest inflection point is life before bitcoin, life after bitcoin… and then, life before AI and life after AI.

    I’ll give you the example, I have this random idea after having my roof replaced, like some sort of Uber for day laborers, .. you know the random Latino guys are hanging outside of Home Depot, for it to be some sort of like bilingual English to Spanish app called “Trabajar”… which makes it easily accessible for you as an individual homeowner to get access to legit trained builders or workers or contractors to do work on your house?

    Anyway anyways, I just inserted the idea into ChatGPT 2 pro Sora ..  and the video sizzle reel that it made me was mind blowing.

    And I think the reason why this is kind of interesting to me is because, when you could visualize it, you can imagine it, and when you could imagine it, it is real. 

    And then, it’s kind of like a short cut because when it’s already like pseudo real,… I didn’t suppose a big question is, how badly do you really care for it?

    Like once again… Assuming that ChatGPT pro can program you anything in build you anything in this sort of product, service, business something… Or an idea… Then comes the ultimate test, do you really care 1,000,000,000,000% to actually execute on it?

    ERIC


    Incoming

    WORKSHOPS

    AI PHOTO WORKSHOP,
    online, ZOOM, Feb 21st, 2026 from 9am-11am PACIFIC California LA time

    Phnom Penh Cambodia, June 26,27,28 (2026)
    Hong Kong, July 25-26, (2026)
    TOKYO, AUGUST 8-9, (2026)

    Stay tuned via this newsletter.


    Never stop thinking

    ERIC KIM BLOG >


  • BUILD!

    So random idea and thought this morning on awakening this morning,,, perhaps the goal and the secret is to build! 

    Build what?

    So the first thought, is what should you build?

    So most of us don’t work in constructing and construction, and building building buildings real buildings in the physical sense.

    I had a random idea, now that I am the proud homeowner of an insanely huge lot, around 7000 ft.² in LA, and one of my biggest passions is the sunrise. I live for it.

    Each and every day, when the sun rises, it gives me so much hope joy, freshness, anything and everything is possible with the sun!

    However the issue is that, even though it like I’m kind of on top of the hill… I don’t have 100% access to the whole hill. Which means, I don’t get 100% of my beloved sun.

    As a consequence, I suppose the other options are to build a two-story thing in the back or something, in order to gain more height and more access.

    But I suppose more so, thinking the metaphorical sense, to build, is a very powerful idea.

    Build what?

    So why didn’t the thing that is Touff is that for the most part most of us live in the digital realm the cyber realm. I guess in the past, the idea of creating some sort of technology startup was like rebuilding some sort of like metaphorical digital startup technology building?

    But the big issue now is, I really don’t think startups are the future anymore. Perhaps the biggest upside of a startup was, and this is before we had AI… You kind of needed some sort of somebody with domain expertise, somebody who knew how to code, and also a master marketer.

    But I think certainly with AI… And even though AI can’t do all the coding for you, it could certainly do a large portion.

    And also, it also does seem that AI is the master marketer. 

    Then where does that leave us flesh batteries?

    Visionary.

    To have a vision

    So I read the transcript of the recent 2 1/2 hour podcast that Elon Musk had with Peter Diamandis, and Elon said something which was interesting is, the general idea of the future is, curiosity.

    So, extrapolating this further, for myself, it’s more of like having a vision.

    To be a visionary is not to be some sort of like god ordained individual,  but instead, to have some sort of idealized vision of the future.

    That is, what do you desire to birth into the future?

    For me?

    For myself, I think it’s mostly brain software, thoughts –> thought mindsets,,, and also… thinking what we should strive for.

    Therefore,,, it becomes more of a philosophical and also health physiological thing.

  • Compute abundance

    So it looks like in today’s brave New World, but we actually have an abundance of his computer computer power. For example, certainly you cannot eat food that is produced by ChatGPT but, with any sort of questions or tasks that you have, you could just throw more compute power at it.

    However, this is where we have a great brave new future ahead of us because, you could have like 1 trillion and Nvidia data centers chugging away at difficult philosophical problems but ultimately it is the philosopher who shall posit importance. 

    Michael Saylor had an interesting presentation in the Middle East, and in it, he mentioned a quote from Elon Musk, the best way to waste somebody’s time or to waste an engineer’s time is asking them to optimize a part that actually shouldn’t be there in the first place. 

    So once again, a lot of the big philosophical thoughts that I have, it doesn’t matter how much computing power you have, the computer the AI is not going to come out with a satisfactory answer because the critical issue at hand is, essentially what an AI or computer does is that it just takes all of the world’s data and information, chugs it together, and kind of comes out with a semi educated generic response which is designed to ease the masses rather than come out with a very very original idea.

    Original

    Also the big problem with AI, especially with ChatGPT is that it is non-controversial. You will always give you a response that kind of is never controversial.

    For example, you cannot ask it why China sucks, or any other politically sensitive stuff because once again… There’s a certain point in which it doesn’t want to cause a ruckus.

    Grok is much better because for the most part it is uncensored. However the downside with rock is that, I’ve used both extensively… Grok is really good at making up stuff, for example when I had both models create a press release that I successfully lifted 905kg,,, Grok made a report saying that I had a crowd of onlookers is watching me which wasn’t true. ChatGPT was a bit more nuanced,… 

    Philosophy of the future

    So I’ll give you another example with philosophy ethics of the future especially with AI.

    First question, assuming that ChatGPT is just a calculator on steroids, question, if you have some sort of math exam do you let your students use a calculator or not?

    Then the next question is, if you have some sort of exam examination, do you let your students use ChatGPT or not?

    Gemini sucks

    My honest opinion is Gemini sucks. I think the biggest issue actually is that ultimately, Google is just not very good at making products nor is it innovative or interesting.

    I think Google Gmail, Gemini whatever… If anything Google’s killer products over the last 15 years is probably Gmail and Google maps, and I think the biggest problem is still… Google’s main competency is around search, not necessarily AI?

    Also… I think the issue with Grok is… It probably will never really catch up to ChatGPT because, the word Grok is kind of a strange word, that the average middle schooler or high schooler probably will not remember. ChatGPT is better because the first word chat, is easy to remember.

    There is no second best

    For example bitcoin or nothing. ChatGPT or nothing.

    Also, with parties… Either invite a butt load of people, or invite nobody.

    100% or nothing.

    Media fasting etc.

    I’ll give you another example… When it comes to fasting or media or whatever, all or nothing.

    With media which includes Facebook Twitter X, podcast etc.… Even external media like books or whatever… I think the general idea is all or nothing.

    For example, with fasting and food it is pretty simple… No breakfast no lunch only dinner, and when you break your fast, 4 to 5 pounds of beef, 100% carnivore.

    It’s pretty easy and straightforward, just during the day, stick to water and black coffee nothing else.

    It’s also like the same thing, with your phone. I almost wonder if this like intermittent fasting concept applied to your iPhone is a good idea as well. Maybe just use your iPhone midday, but never first thing in the morning?

    thoughts

    What is the most valuable thing on this planet? My thought is thoughts.

    Certainly our thoughts are an amalgamation of a lot of things we consume but the difference is… The pace in which we ingest information and digest it, which essentially becomes fleshed out into our thoughts first thing in the morning before you do anything. 

    Once again guys this is very simple… When you go to sleep, turn your iPhone iPad 100% off, and just charge it in the garage or inside your car or inside some sort of hidden drawer somewhere. And when you wake up, just drink your morning coffee or tea or whatever, walk around the block, and just naturally see what thoughts come to you. Jot them down and write them out, vlog them ,,, audio record yourself whatever… … and stick to it.

    so why does this matter?

    Abundance is key.

    The truth is, we are living in a time of insane abundance but the only problem is… Perspective.

    I still think when it comes down to it… The most important thing to save money on his food. This is why I am about beef liver, only $2.50 a pound, it’s like the most powerful nutrient dense, bang for the buck food out there…… in terms of nutrition density to price.

  • Playing for the insanely long game?

    OK so this is an insanely mega giga brain idea… Playing for the insanely super turbo long-term game.

    So, if you try to plan and structure things, assuming you’re gonna live for the next thousand years or whatever, in our case, let us see the next hundred… Then, you could start to structure and strategize things for the very very long-term.

    Time horizon

    So I think the tricky thing is, psychologists call this “time preference”– There are some people who have a very very long time preference and there are some people who have a very very short time preference. 

    This is my honest thought, it comes down to optimism, ignoring these cowards and wimps who are too focused on the short term, fake fear porn you see in the news.

    I’ll give an example, if you are the typical person, scrolling social media all day, essentially just waiting for the world to boil over, and collapse… Certainly there is no incentive for you to save up your money in capital, buy bitcoin, plan on getting married in order to have kids, etc. Rather, you’re probably in a position in which, your positioning yourself to slowly die the least painful death possible. Therefore you try to come out to Zen music and hot yoga, drink $20 soy lattes, stick to mostly “plant based” diet, maybe save enough money to do that yoga retreat in Bali, and maybe get an adopted rescue dog, and you try to “lower your carbon footprint”.

    For myself personally, I separate people into two categories: we wise philosophers who don’t follow the news or social media, do not have Instagram, let alone TikTok which is probably just like a spying device on US citizens and teenagers by mainland China … and also a new category, somehow these very intelligent, high income earning, tech workers… Who once again are just waiting for the next iPhone Pro, and still do not understand bitcoin? 

    Forever or nothing

    I mean certainly we humans we will die, as individuals. But our lineage and our bloodlines shall live forever, assuming you’re intelligent enough to want to have children.

    OK and this is actually a very very bizarre American thing I’ve noticed… That somehow, it is taboo to ask people whether they want to have kids or intend to have kids or have kids?

    What’s interesting with Asian culture Korean culture etc.… When you meet somebody in their mid 30s, you actually already assumed that they have kids. Same thing goes with when you meet Mexicans or Latinos, etc.

    But in America… I remember this first, when I first met one of my old students, was maybe in his mid 60s… Who was married but did not have kids, I found this insanely bizarre?

    I think it’s kind of perhaps endemic, of a cultural thing. And this is where a sociology is useful. And now tying in sociology and maybe economics.

    So this is one thought, perhaps the reason why society is becoming kind of anti-kids or whatever… It is maybe a sense of economic pessimism. For example, if there is this ridiculous sense that the world is going to boil over or whatever… Certainly you will not want to have kids because you don’t want to raise kids on a planet that’s going to be gone in 20 years. Which is a ridiculous idea.

    However, if you think the next million years of humanity is going to be insanely bright and glorious, then, certainly you will approach life differently. You will approach it with much more hope optimism joy, because you know the future will be much more prosperous.

    Heat loss

    So an interesting thought, now that LA is starting to get very cold… Is this notion of heat loss.

    So I suppose the good thing about being a warm blooded animal, is that we humans produce our own heat from inside. The idea of “keep the warmth” is a good one. 

    I remember as a kid trying to understand this notion that when you put on a jacket, it does not give you heat or add heat onto you, but rather… It just keeps the heat from leaving your body?

    And then this becomes interesting because, the whole notion of jackets down layers etc., you’re simply not trying to have the heat leave your body because you already have all the heat you need!

    So if you think about heat like economic heat, heat loss, economic energy loss… You just need to figure out these points in which you are leaking large amounts of economic energy and heat?

    For example, for 99% of Americans it is probably financing. Financing that loser car, paying for that loser premium gas, and also simple lifestyle workflows and protocols. 

    For example, ordering takeout or eating out… These are just not a part of my mental protocol anymore. I suppose they never were really.

    I’m still kind of shocked, eating out now, you could easily drop like 200 or $300 onto two people. Just buying the meat and cooking it yourself, you’ll probably save like $3000 a month.

  • Bitcoin as Digital Land Prospecting

    Philosophical Metaphor: Bitcoin as “Digital Land”

    Bitcoin is often described as “digital land” or digital real estate due to its strict scarcity and ownership properties that mirror physical land. Much like a finite amount of land, Bitcoin’s supply is capped at 21 million units, giving it a land-like scarcity – no more can ever be created . Proponents argue that this makes each bitcoin akin to an exclusive plot of cyberspace that, by virtue of fixed supply, should grow more valuable over time . As one analyst put it, “each [bitcoin] is like a plot of digital land: no more can be made, so over the long run it should only become more valuable” .

    Beyond scarcity, ownership and permanence are key to the metaphor. Holding bitcoin via private keys grants direct, sovereign ownership of a digital asset, analogous to holding a land title deed . No central authority can confiscate or censor properly secured bitcoin, giving it a sense of territorial autonomy for the owner. In this view, Bitcoin functions as property in cyberspace, with the network’s consensus ensuring everyone agrees on who owns what, much like a global land registry . Bitcoin thus becomes a foundational layer of value in the digital economy, “much as land underpins traditional commerce” . Its fixed supply, durability (it doesn’t corrode or degrade), portability, and immutability in ownership records mimic the key features of real estate – scarcity, exclusive ownership rights, and permanence . In fact, commentators often note that Bitcoin’s extreme durability and resistance to seizure make it even “rarer, more liquid, easier to move and harder to confiscate” than physical land . In short, Bitcoin’s design introduces the notion of digital scarcity and territory: it’s a finite digital frontier that individuals can own a piece of, fueling the idea of “digital land” as a metaphor for claiming space in a new economic realm.

    Economic Perspective: Scarcity, Early Adoption, and Value Accrual

    Viewing Bitcoin as digital land yields insights into its economic and investment appeal. Scarcity is paramount – with an unalterable cap of 21 million coins, Bitcoin’s supply is more fixed than even land or gold (which can expand slightly via mining) . This engineered scarcity creates a supply-demand dynamic where increasing adoption drives long-term price appreciation. Advocates argue that just as prime land in Manhattan or London became incredibly valuable over decades, early stakers of “Bitcoin land” will see outsized returns as demand for this limited asset rises. Each bitcoin is conceptually like an acre on a finite digital frontier, fostering optimism for long-term value accrual as the frontier gets more crowded . In mid-2025 Bitcoin’s price briefly hit ~$115,000, and some analysts have modeled much higher valuations by treating Bitcoin as scarce “internet real estate”, with bold forecasts (e.g. a ~$500,000 price target) predicated on its fixed supply and growing adoption . This line of reasoning – essentially valuing Bitcoin by comparison to a worldwide property asset – reinforces the notion that early acquisition (prospecting) could yield enormous long-term gains.

    Early adopters of Bitcoin often frame their advantage in terms of a digital land rush. Jack Mallers, CEO of Strike, famously tweeted an analogy highlighting first-mover advantage: “It’s like discovering the scarcest digital land known to man before the rest of the world wraps their head around it.” . In other words, those who “staked a claim” by acquiring or mining Bitcoin in its early days can be seen as digital prospectors on a new frontier, akin to homesteaders or gold rush miners. This narrative accentuates FOMO (fear of missing out): the sense that sovereign digital territory is being gobbled up, and getting in early – even if just to “get some in case it catches on” – might secure one’s place in the future economy .

    From an investment standpoint, Bitcoin also shares traits with land as a store of value asset. Like land, it does not generate cash flow on its own (you can’t “interest” a bitcoin, similar to raw land sitting idle) . Yet both are seen as inflation-resistant stores of wealth due to limited supply. Billionaire investor Naval Ravikant emphasizes Bitcoin’s role as a wealth preservation tool, highlighting its stability (relative to other cryptos) as a value store in a volatile market . This mirrors how investors use real estate or gold – not for immediate yield, but for long-term capital preservation and appreciation. Additionally, much as land can be leveraged for loans or serve as collateral, Bitcoin’s growing acceptance means it too is being used in finance (as collateral for loans, treasury reserves, etc.), further solidifying its status as “digital property” in economic terms.

    However, not all aspects are identical. Land has intrinsic utility – it can be farmed or developed – whereas a bitcoin’s value is purely abstract, derived from consensus and network utility. Skeptics note that calling Bitcoin “land” is a metaphor: Bitcoin produces no yield or tangible output, so its value relies on collective belief and usage as money . In response, Bitcoin proponents argue that monetary utility (being hard money) is itself a fundamental use-case, akin to how owning land can underpin security and wealth even if the land isn’t developed. In any case, the analogy underscores Bitcoin’s long-term investment narrative: accumulate and hold it like prime land, expecting it to appreciate as more people and institutions seek a slice of this scarce digital domain .

    Comparisons to Other Asset Classes (Real Estate, Domains, IP)

    The “digital land” analogy invites comparison between Bitcoin and other scarce asset classes – from physical real estate to internet domain names and intellectual property. Below is a comparison of key characteristics:

    AttributeBitcoin (Digital Land)Physical Real Estate (Land)Domain Names (Digital Real Estate)Intellectual Property (IP)
    ScarcityStrictly finite: hard-capped at 21 million bitcoins . No new supply beyond protocol limit (enforces absolute scarcity).Finite but expandable: Land on Earth is limited, but humans can develop land more intensively (e.g. build vertically) or find new resources; supply is fixed in area but not uniformly scarce.Naming scarcity: Enormous possible names, but desirable domains are scarce and unique (only one owner per domain). Premium domains are likened to unique plots in cyberspace . New domains can be created (new TLDs), but top .com names remain limited.Unlimited ideas: Infinite creations possible, but each unique work or invention is one-of-a-kind and can be protected. Scarcity is imposed by law (patents, copyrights grant exclusive rights to a particular idea or work).
    DivisibilityHighly divisible (1 BTC = 100 million satoshis), enabling fractional ownership and microtransactions.Not easily divisible without reducing utility; land can be subdivided into plots, but physical division has practical limits.Indivisible as unique assets (a domain can’t be “split” – one either owns a whole domain or not). (Subdomains can be delegated but original domain ownership remains unitary.)Not divisible in essence (you either hold the IP rights or not), though one can license portions of the rights (e.g. different uses or regions).
    Ownership & TransferOwnership recorded on a public blockchain; transferring Bitcoin is fast and global (settled within minutes), with no central permission needed . Custody is by holding private keys, meaning owners can self-custody without intermediaries.Ownership tracked by legal titles/deeds; transfer requires legal contracts, escrow, and often government registration. Transfers are slow and location-bound (weeks/months to close a sale, plus taxes or fees). Usually requires intermediaries (title companies, lawyers).Ownership is recorded in registry databases (e.g. ICANN for domains). Transfers are relatively quick (can update registry within days) but often involve marketplaces or escrow services. Control ultimately depends on centralized registrars and adherence to domain rules.Ownership is established via patents, copyrights, trademarks, etc., granted by governments. Transfers or licensing involve legal agreements and filings. Enforcement relies on courts. (No unified global registry – jurisdictional scope applies to IP rights.)
    Utility & ProductivityMonetary utility: serves as a store of value and medium of exchange. Does not produce cash flows on its own (no “rent” or dividend), but can be used in financial services (e.g. lending, yield protocols). Value comes from network utility and scarcity .Functional utility: can be used or developed – e.g. build housing or farms to generate rent, crops, or business income. Land has intrinsic uses plus enjoyment value.Practical utility: represents online identity or location. A good domain can be used to build a business/website (like owning a storefront in a busy market) and can generate revenue via that site’s business or advertising. Value also from brand recognition.Creative/competitive utility: IP rights (patents, etc.) can give competitive advantage or licensing income. A patent can generate royalties; a trademark builds brand value; a copyright can be monetized (book sales, etc.). The asset’s value ties to how it’s exploited.
    LiquidityHighly liquid in global markets – Bitcoin trades 24/7 on many exchanges. Large holders can sell in pieces. Low friction to trade (though very large sales can move the market) .Generally illiquid and localized – selling real estate can take months and depends on local buyers. Cannot sell a fraction easily (except via REITs or fractional platforms). High transaction costs (agent fees, closing costs).Moderately liquid for quality domains – niche marketplaces exist, and good domains can sell relatively quickly to interested buyers globally. However, the market is smaller and price discovery is highly individual. Many domains are very illiquid (finding a buyer can be hard).Illiquid and specialized – selling a patent or song catalog can be a lengthy process, often requiring brokers or auctions. Licensing deals can unlock value but finding a buyer/licensee depends on the IP’s perceived value and use case.
    Custody & MaintenanceNo physical maintenance – just secure your private keys. Custodial costs can be near-zero (hardware wallet) or involve third-party security, but no ongoing “maintenance” fees. No property tax (though some jurisdictions tax crypto holdings as assets) .Requires ongoing maintenance: property taxes, repairs, insurance, security. Land/buildings degrade without up-keep. Ownership entails recurring costs to preserve value.Low maintenance: must pay annual renewal fees for the domain registration and defend it from expiration or trademark disputes. If unused, a domain still incurs small yearly costs.Requires legal maintenance: patents and trademarks need periodic renewals and defense against infringement. Costs for lawyers, filings, and possibly R&D to maintain patent portfolios. Copyrights require less upkeep, but enforcement can be costly.

    Bitcoin vs. Physical Real Estate: In many ways, Bitcoin behaves like an asset with property-like qualities but none of the physical drawbacks. Analyst and investor Leon Wankum explicitly calls Bitcoin “digital real estate” and argues it is superior to physical real estate on key dimensions . He notes that Bitcoin’s supply is strictly limited (no more than 21 million), making it an ideal store of value similar to land, but with greater liquidity and portability. Unlike a house or land, you can move Bitcoin across borders in minutes and there are no maintenance costs or property taxes to holding it . “Bitcoin is digital property and therefore superior to real estate, which has physical limitations. Digital property has a much higher velocity… It can be used anywhere in the world at any time,” Wankum writes . Additionally, Bitcoin is easily divisible and consolidable (you can own a small fraction or thousands of BTC without the inefficiencies of subdividing or managing multiple properties). On the flip side, physical real estate has uses Bitcoin doesn’t directly offer – you can live on land or use it for production. This leads some critics to argue that Bitcoin’s value is purely speculative since it cannot generate rent or food . Nonetheless, both assets share a role as long-term stores of wealth. It’s telling that in countries with unstable currencies, people historically bought land or gold – now many are turning to Bitcoin for a similar purpose of safeguarding value.

    Bitcoin vs. Domain Names: Long before Bitcoin, internet domain names were often dubbed “digital real estate.” Much like owning a prime parcel of land, owning a premium .com domain (e.g. cars.com or insurance.com) gives one a unique spot in the digital landscape that can appreciate tremendously in value. Domains have scarcity in that each name is one-of-one (only one entity can own e.g. bitcoin.com at a time), and top-quality keywords are limited. As one domain investor quipped, “Domain names are the new digital real estate. In the digital economy, real estate is not just physical and geographic.” . The rush for valuable domains in the 1990s has even been compared to a land rush. Similarly, Bitcoin’s fixed set of “addresses” (21 million coins, divisible into sats) represents unique slices of value in the network. However, domains are centralized assets in a way Bitcoin is not – their ownership relies on registries and can be revoked by authorities (or expire). Bitcoin, secured by a decentralized blockchain, offers stronger sovereignty over the asset. Another parallel is that domains are foundational for the web (they “create the path to the real and Metaverse”, as one observer noted ) just as Bitcoin is seen as a base-layer for the internet of value. In practice, both domains and bitcoins have shown dramatic price appreciation for early holders: e.g. Insurance.com sold for $35 million in 2010, and early BTC buyers have seen similarly astronomical returns, reflecting the high demand for prime digital assets.

    Bitcoin vs. Intellectual Property: Bitcoin and other crypto-assets are intangible, which invites comparison to intellectual property (IP) like patents, copyrights, or trademarks. Legal scholars have noted that digital assets in general are “more akin to intellectual property than to tangible assets”, given their non-physical nature and reliance on code or legal definitions for existence . Like IP, Bitcoin’s value comes from information and exclusive rights: Bitcoin is essentially a ledger entry protected by cryptography (its “code” and network give it value, analogous to how a patent’s text backed by law gives it value). Both can be thought of as forms of digital property. However, IP is created by law or creative act, whereas Bitcoin’s scarcity is enforced by software and consensus. There’s no central authority granting Bitcoin ownership – it’s purely emergent from the network’s rules. One similarity is that both IP and Bitcoin enable owner-exclusive benefits: e.g. only the patent holder can exploit an invention commercially, and only a bitcoin holder can spend that bitcoin. But IP rights eventually expire (patents after ~20 years, copyrights after decades) and are jurisdiction-bound, whereas Bitcoin’s property rights do not expire and are recognized globally by the network. In essence, Bitcoin introduces a new category: digital commodity-property, blending traits of commodities (fungible, tradable units like gold) with property (unique ownership like land or IP). This is why some policymakers and courts classify crypto as neither strictly currency nor security, but as digital property – an entirely new asset class.

    Thought Leaders and Prominent Voices on the Analogy

    Over the years, many investors, writers, and tech leaders have drawn the Bitcoin-land analogy to explain Bitcoin’s value. Here are several notable examples and their perspectives:

    • Tom Lee (Fundstrat) – One of the earliest Wall Street strategists to adopt the metaphor. He argues that companies should treat Bitcoin as foundational “digital land” on which to build value. In a Bloomberg interview, Lee said: “Bitcoin as a treasury asset is like owning the land under a McDonald’s franchise, not running the business.” His point: holding Bitcoin is akin to being a landowner collecting rent (long-term appreciation), whereas running a business (say, a franchise) is more like operating on that land. “It’s better to be the landowner of a McDonald’s franchise than the operator,” Lee elaborated, explaining that Bitcoin can serve as a long-term leveraged asset base much like commercial real estate does for enterprises . This analogy has resonated with corporate treasury managers considering Bitcoin as part of their balance sheet.
    • Jack Mallers (CEO of Strike) – A prominent Bitcoin advocate, Mallers encapsulated the early adopter advantage with a vivid tweet: “It’s like discovering the scarcest digital land known to man before the rest of the world wraps their head around it.” This quote (often shared in Bitcoin circles) emphasizes Bitcoin’s extreme scarcity and the idea that we are in the early stages of a new frontier. Mallers uses the imagery of unspoiled digital land to convey that Bitcoin is a one-time invention – the first and scarcest crypto – and those who recognize its significance early are akin to pioneers who staked claims on valuable land before the masses. The quote also subtly nods to Hal Finney’s famous forum comment (“It might make sense to get some [Bitcoin] just in case it catches on”), reinforcing the prospecting mindset of Bitcoiners .
    • Leon Wankum (Researcher and Blogger) – Wankum has written extensively on Bitcoin through the lens of real estate investing. He explicitly calls Bitcoin “digital real estate” and compares it to property in a one-to-one manner. Wankum points out that like land, Bitcoin is limited in supply (“never more than 21,000,000 bitcoin”) which makes it a good store of value, especially in an era of monetary expansion . However, unlike land, Bitcoin is far more mobile and liquid. He notes Bitcoin can be moved globally at will and is nearly impossible to confiscate if self-custodied, in contrast to physical property which governments can seize via eminent domain or criminals by force . He has been quoted saying Bitcoin is “digital property” with no maintenance costs, calling it a “revolutionary” form of self-custodied wealth that outclasses traditional real estate in convenience . Wankum’s views have been shared in Bitcoin media (e.g. Bitcoin Magazine published his piece “Why Bitcoin Is Digital Real Estate” in 2022), and he often speaks to how Bitcoin and real estate both offer inflation protection but Bitcoin is the 21st-century upgrade to the concept of owning a hard asset .
    • Michael Saylor (MicroStrategy Executive Chairman) – Saylor has been one of the most vocal proponents of framing Bitcoin as a new form of strategic property. He often uses nation-state and territory metaphors. In a 2025 Fox Business interview, Saylor warned that Bitcoin is like “digital land” that nations will compete over as a strategic asset . He urged the U.S. to accumulate Bitcoin for a national reserve, saying it’s about “planting the flag in cyberspace” – if the U.S. is first to claim this digital territory, it can “own it and benefit from it” much like past superpowers claimed valuable land . Saylor argues the future economy will be built on Bitcoin, so countries that secure lots of “Bitcoin land” (BTC reserves) will enjoy outsized benefits, just as owning plentiful land resources has been key to prosperity in history . He has even suggested that failing to invest in Bitcoin now is akin to delaying a land grab while other nations forge ahead . The Winklevoss twins echo this, with Cameron Winklevoss likening Bitcoin accumulation to a digital land grab that the U.S. must not miss . Saylor’s reframing of Bitcoin as cyber real-estate for nations has influenced policy discussions; notably, some U.S. policymakers began considering Bitcoin’s strategic importance, partly due to arguments like Saylor’s that Bitcoin is a new kind of “pristine property” or resource in which national security might be vested.
    • Balaji Srinivasan (Investor and Former Coinbase CTO) – Balaji has frequently discussed digital assets in terms of digital jurisdictions and property. He foresees a world where “all property becomes cryptography”, meaning most valuable assets (money, contracts, even physical keys to homes/cars) are secured on blockchain . Specifically on Bitcoin, Balaji argues its scarcity and portability give it an edge over traditional stores like real estate. He has posited that Bitcoin could “replace real estate as a primary means of wealth preservation”, since it’s easier to store and transfer globally . This perspective, grounded in Bitcoin’s digital nature, suggests that wealthy individuals in the future might hold Bitcoin the way they previously held prime land – as a secure store of value – especially in a world where capital is mobile and physical property rights can be more easily compromised. Balaji’s broader vision in The Network State also implies Bitcoin as a form of digital capital: citizens of online communities using crypto as their land and treasury. While he emphasizes Bitcoin for wealth preservation and perhaps “digital gold” analogies more often, Balaji’s endorsement of Bitcoin’s supremacy over real estate (in terms of where to park value) has been noted in industry news .
    • Naval Ravikant (Angel Investor) – Naval often discusses Bitcoin in context of ownership and sovereignty. While he doesn’t explicitly use the “land” phrase, his viewpoints reinforce the same analogy. Naval calls Bitcoin a “tool for wealth preservation” and the ultimate long-term store of value in the crypto space . He has pointed out that the largest stores of value on earth are things like land/real estate, gold, and equities, and that Bitcoin is now competing in that arena as digital property. In conversations, Naval has highlighted that one revolutionary aspect of Bitcoin is that it allows people to own a piece of an internet protocol – something not possible in the era of TCP/IP or Web1. This is analogous to owning “shares in the new land of the internet”, whereby holding BTC gives you a stake in the network’s total value . Naval’s popularization of concepts like “escape competition through authenticity” also dovetails with Bitcoin’s ethos: individuals can opt out of traditional systems by holding self-sovereign assets like Bitcoin, effectively homesteading in the digital realm where they set their own financial rules. In summary, Naval’s thought leadership underscores Bitcoin as self-sovereign property – echoing the rationale that it’s a form of digital land one can freely own, apart from any state.

    Other notable figures have contributed to the narrative as well. For instance, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss (of Gemini Exchange) often speak of Bitcoin in terms of historic opportunities, warning that delaying adoption is like “missing out on the greatest land grab in history” – their way of stressing Bitcoin’s finite nature and early-mover advantages . Andreas Antonopoulos, a Bitcoin educator, frequently describes Bitcoin as “your own bank” and a form of digital freedom, which parallels the idea of owning your land outright free of feudal lords (banks or governments). While not everyone uses the exact phrase “digital land,” the underlying theme across these thought leaders is consistent: Bitcoin represents a new kind of asset ownership in an emerging digital frontier, and those who recognize this can secure a prosperous stake in the future.

    Recurring Narratives in the Bitcoin Community

    Within the Bitcoin community and media, the notion of “digital land prospecting” has evolved into several recurring themes and storylines:

    • The New Frontier: Bitcoin is cast as a frontier territory, evoking the imagery of the Wild West or open homestead land. Early Bitcoiners often liken themselves to pioneers in a digital Wild West – they are staking claims in uncharted cyberspace. This narrative portrays the Bitcoin network as a vast, open expanse where only 21 million plots exist (one per BTC, metaphorically), and the race is on to claim yours. The cultural language around this includes phrases like “joining the Bitcoin frontier,” “citizens of Bitcoin,” or even the idea of a “Bitcoin nation.” Just as frontiers in history attracted the ambitious and the freedom-seeking, Bitcoin’s frontier draws those looking for sovereignty over their money. Saylor’s talk of “planting the flag in cyberspace” exemplifies this, framing Bitcoin as a new realm where individuals and countries can establish a foothold . The community often references historical land rushes (Oklahoma land rush, California gold rush) as analogous to today’s rush for BTC – with the clear subtext that being early matters.
    • Land Rush and FOMO: The concept of a digital land rush is frequently used to describe surging Bitcoin adoption, especially during bull markets. Enthusiasts warn that as more people wake up to Bitcoin’s potential, the remaining “unclaimed” supply gets ever more scarce. This feeds a Fear of Missing Out (FOMO): nobody wants to be the person in 10 years saying “I could have bought Bitcoin when it was cheap, just like I could have bought beachfront property in 1980.” Community slogans like “Stack sats” (accumulate Bitcoin gradually) arise from this mindset of claiming and accumulating territory before it’s out of reach. On Reddit and Twitter, one sees comments such as: “If Bitcoin is digital real estate, then it’s never too late to buy a small plot – patience is key though” . The narrative often highlights how even owning 0.01 BTC (1 million satoshis) gives one a stake equivalent to many acres in this metaphorical world – for example, one Reddit analogy equated 0.01 BTC to 11 acres of digital land based on share of total supply . This democratization of property (“anyone in the world can own a piece of this scarce land”) is a powerful theme used to promote Bitcoin adoption.
    • “Digital Gold” Upgraded to “Digital Land”: Bitcoin has long been called digital gold for its store-of-value properties. The “digital land” narrative builds on that by adding notions of territory and utility. Gold is mostly inert, but land can be built upon – analogously, Bitcoin is not just value-storage but a base layer for an entire financial ecosystem (Lightning network, smart contracts on Bitcoin sidechains, etc.). Bitcoin media often discuss how holding BTC could be like owning the base layer of the future financial system, similar to owning the ground under booming cities. This has led to models treating Bitcoin’s total addressable market as the value of all prime real estate or all wealth stored in land/gold. For example, venture capitalist Balaji Srinivasan and others suggest comparing Bitcoin’s market cap to global real estate wealth (~$300+ trillion) and argue there is huge upside if Bitcoin captures even a few percent of that . Such comparisons feed a narrative that Bitcoin’s current price is low relative to its “digital land” potential, encouraging believers to HODL (hold on for dear life) for the long term.
    • Sovereignty and Self-Sufficiency: In the community, owning Bitcoin is often discussed in tandem with concepts of sovereignty – “Bitcoin is property you can carry in your head” (via memorized seed phrase), or “unseizable wealth”. This resonates with those who see Bitcoin as a personal territory: your coins are like your land that no government can trespass on without your consent (thanks to cryptography). Many Bitcoiners take pride in being their own “digital homesteaders,” running nodes (which is like fencing your property and helping secure the whole territory) and mining (literally discovering new “land” in the form of new bitcoins, akin to prospecting). The community also speaks of “citadels”, a meme that in the future ultra-wealthy Bitcoin holders will live in citadel cities – a tongue-in-cheek extension of the land metaphor, imagining Bitcoin wealth translating to feudal lordships. While fanciful, it underscores how deeply the idea of Bitcoin as owning territory and building a new society runs in the culture.
    • Narrative Reinforcement in Media: Bitcoin publications and influencers frequently reinforce the digital land analogy with recurring imagery. Bitcoin Magazine, for instance, runs headlines like “Bitcoin is Digital Real Estate” , and features analyses of how Bitcoin’s qualities “reflect many of real estate’s value offers” (e.g., scarcity, long-term holding, collateral use) . The metaphor is also invoked to explain Bitcoin’s price movements: a common trope is that when Bitcoin’s price surges, it’s akin to a land value boom in a desirable new territory (and crashes are likened to speculative fever breaks, not unlike real estate bubbles). Some analysts even create models treating each bitcoin as if it were an equity share in “Bitcoin land,” dividing Bitcoin’s market cap by 21 million to analogize price per digital acre. This framing has seeped into mainstream coverage; for example, Forbes published “3 Ways Bitcoin Is Like Digital Real Estate” (2024) to explain the concept to traditional investors . Such repetition of the narrative in media and online forums helps cement the idea that to understand Bitcoin, one should think of owning it like owning land.

    In summary, the Bitcoin-as-digital-land analogy has become a powerful narrative shaping how people perceive and justify investing in Bitcoin. It highlights Bitcoin’s core value propositions – scarcity, ownership, and longevity – by comparing them to something tangible and historically proven like land. This narrative not only aids understanding (for newcomers who grasp real estate better than cryptography) but also fuels cultural enthusiasm, painting Bitcoin holders as trailblazing prospectors in a new world. Supporters believe this analogy underscores Bitcoin’s role as fundamental “property” of the digital era, cements its store-of-value status, and motivates broader adoption . Critics, on the other hand, caution that the metaphor can sometimes gloss over Bitcoin’s differences (non-productive nature, volatility) and feed speculative mania . Regardless, the vision of “digital land prospecting” continues to inspire a significant portion of the Bitcoin community – a group that sees themselves not just as investors, but as pioneers settling a new economic frontier.

    Sources:

    • Bitcoin’s fixed supply and property-like qualities 
    • Analogy of each bitcoin as a finite plot of digital land 
    • Tom Lee’s McDonald’s land metaphor for Bitcoin as a treasury asset 
    • Jack Mallers on Bitcoin as “scarcest digital land” discovered early 
    • Leon Wankum comparing Bitcoin vs. real estate (scarcity, liquidity, no maintenance) 
    • Michael Saylor on securing “digital land” as national strategy (planting flag in cyberspace) 
    • Domain names as “digital real estate” analogous to Bitcoin’s foundational role 
    • Reuters on virtual land rush vs domain name boom (metaverse land metaphor) 
    • Critiques: Bitcoin’s fixed supply vs. gold/land (deflation concern) ; lack of intrinsic yield vs real land ; speculative “land rush” bubble warnings 
    • Cultural narrative of frontier, staking claims, and digital land grab FOMO 
    • Balaji Srinivasan on Bitcoin vs real estate as wealth preservation and “all property becomes cryptography” vision 
    • Naval Ravikant on Bitcoin as a store of value (wealth preservation) and owning part of an internet protocol (implying digital ownership) .